Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Anthony Marsh

7:09 PM (3 hours ago)

On 10/8/2015 10:20 PM, Ralph Cinque wrote:
> Turning every statement into a question is really quite ridiculous?
>
> I know this is mostly a pro-officialdom forum. And it also includes
> anti-officialdom people who have their own quirky idea, such as Anthony
> Marsh, who thinks that Oswald didn't kill Kennedy but did kill Tippit, and
> supposedly because he feared being arrested for attempting to shoot
> Walker. But, who would compound an attempted shooting in which no one got
> hurt with an actual murder? You would truly have to be out of your

Happens every day in real life. Watch some of those TV shows like Caught 
on Camera. A cop makes a routine traffic stop and the driver comes out 
shooting? Why? Because he had just assassinated the President? No, because 
he didn't want to be arrested for some other crime he had once committed. 

Ralph Cinque:

Happens every day in real life, Marsh?

And your reference for that is television shows? 

No, Marsh. You're wrong. You're flat-out, whacked-out, zapped-out wrong.  

Oswald would have to have been insane, as in completely out of his mind, to murder Tippit in fear that Tippit was going to arrest him for taking a pot shot at Walker 8 months before in which no one got hurt. 

And the whole scenario of yours is insane. That was an 8 month old case. By this time, it was in the hands of detectives- not street patrol officers. If, after 8 months, they got a lead that a Lee Harvey Oswald had done it, they would have sent an officer or detective to his home or place of work to bring him in for questioning, but it wouldn't involve a patrol officer who was just riding by. And, it was after 1:00. Kennedy was already dead. The culprit was on the loose. You can't tell me that Tippit stopped Oswald at a time like that over the Walker pot shot. And if he stopped him over Kennedy, based on what? His physical description? The description that went out over the police wire was for a 30 year old man, 5'10, 165 pounds. You think that Tippit would have stopped Oswald based on that? You think that's how police work is done, that you just start pulling over people on the street? 

The only basis on which he would have stopped Oswald was if Oswald was doing something suspicious or acting suspicious.

But, what did Oswald have to act suspicious about? He hadn't done anything. 

And don't bring up Walker again. That was so long ago that even Oswald probably forgot about it- that is to say IF he ever knew about it, which he didn't. THE WHOLE WALKER STORY IS FALSE. IT'S JUST MORE FRAMING OF OSWALD; THAT'S ALL IT IS.  


So no, Marsh, Oswald would NOT have been thinking about Walker. OSWALD WOULD HAVE HAD NO MORE REASON TO THINK THAT TIPPIT DETAINED HIM OVER WALKER THAN HE HAD TO THINK THAT BAKER DETAINED HIM OVER WALKER.

Reportedly, Oswald didn't say anything at the Baker encounter because Truly spoke for him. But, in this case, he would have had to respond to Tippit. And he would have. But, there is no basis to think that he was going to pull out a gun and shoot the guy. 

Listen, Marsh: your idea that Oswald didn't kill Kennedy but did kill Tippit is the kookiest, craziest, zaniest, insaniest idea that ever surfaced in the JFK world. Bar none.