Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

bpete deliberately uses distorted images in order to lie. He, or somebody, adjusted the aspect ratio of this frame in order to slenderize the big, stocky man at the top of the doorway.

Quite a difference, eh? And I assure the one on the right (bpete's) is the distorted one. That big husky guy could not possibly be Buell Frazier who was very skinny at the time. 

Now, did Frazier work until noon when everybody else got off at 11:45?  We are supposed to believe that just because he glibly said it? A guy who said he was "back up in the shadows" after saying he was down from the top next to the railing? A guy who said that he was 3 or 4 steps above Lovelady when Lovelady said he was on the top level? A guy who estimated Lovelady's height as 5'2 when he was 5'8"? 

You can be damn sure that if everyone else stopped working at 11:45, Frazier did too. 

Frazier said he hung up his coat. But, he didn't even wear a coat. He wore a jacket.

A coat is definitely longer than that and heavier too. 

Whether you like it or not, the images rule. You can parse the words all day long, but in the end, you see what you see. 

Here is Frazier at the PD. 

He's not wearing a white shirt. You see the man behind him wearing the hat? He is wearing a white shirt. Compare it to Frazier's. So, how could that be the bright white shirt we see on this guy?

Here's another image of him:

Study the shirt. Study it closely. Does it look to be this?

I think not. That big Herculean guy is definitely not Frazier.

This collage below is by Larry Rivera. Look how well the grey scale matches for the hair, the jacket, and the trousers. 

You think you can overcome that with some word parsing? That would be some coincidence if someone else was configured just like him in regard to his height, his hair, his jacket, and his pants. 
People who play the coincidence card in the JFK assassination are bloodied liars.