Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Glenn V.

9:55 AM (3 hours ago)

How, in essence, did things go about when you chose to join this forum?
Please be honest?

Now, it couldn't possibly be to entertain the gullible - you do this in
several forums already. Where you successfully ban all opponents?

You couldn't possibly have expected to convince John McAdams -the person
who you slander all around the Internet?

Did you believe you where going to convince someone here about your
theories?

How do you think that turned out? Counting, how many followers here, or
readers, have you earned by now?

No reason to think McAdams rules are the only place left for you? 

Ralph Cinque:

Turning every statement into a question is really quite ridiculous?

I know McAdams' forum is mostly a pro-officialdom forum. And it also includes anti-officialdom people who have their own quirky ideas, such as Anthony Marsh, who thinks that Oswald didn't kill Kennedy but did kill Tippit, and supposedly because he feared being arrested for attempting to shoot Walker. But, who would compound an attempted shooting in which no one got the least bit hurt with an actual murder? You would truly have to be out of your blithering mind. Of course, the fact is that Oswald never tried to shoot Walker; he didn't even own a rifle by which to do so. But, the point is that if he had, even if that part of the story were true, the idea that immediately after the Kennedy assassination, the Dallas Police would be concerned with arresting someone for taking a pot shot 8 months before in which no one got hurt, is pretty damn insane. And I know Oswald wasn't insane, so he couldn't have thought that. So, who does that leave?

Then you've got Robert Harris who thinks the Mafia did it, including placing Oswald on the 6th floor as a shooter. But, why would the Mafia think Oswald was a competent sniper when he never sniped before? He would have failed his last standard shooting test in the Marines had he gotten one point less. And after that, the only shooting he did was to go deer hunting in Russia with a shotgun. So, how does that translate to assassin? "Yeah, let's get Oswald to do it. He's killed dozens."

Then, you've got Chris the mainframeguy, who thinks that Oswald did bring a rifle to work but only to show somebody. Hmmm. Then, why didn't Oswald say so? Wouldn't that have been better than lying and saying he didn't own a rifle at all? And why didn't he name the guy he was going to show the rifle to? What evidence is there to support this story? 

So, here's what we've got: we've got diehards, like you and McAdams and Emberling and David Von Pein, who are going to go down with the ship. You're all going to defend the official story to the end- and the end is coming. 

And then you've got the quirks like Marsh and Harris. And then you've got the sycophants like Pink O'Blazney who can't decide whom he likes better, bpete or David Von Pein.  

And then you've got me who tells the truth, that Oswald was in the doorway at the time of the shooting, that we can see him there, that we don't have to depend on anyone's lipflapping or on government pronouncements, that we can use our own eyes and mind to see that that he was there. 

And things are turning out fine. They're going well. The OIC has grown. We are larger than ever before. The OIC website and my blog have great web presence and search engine visibility. And it's onward and upward from here. 


We have already made history. We are part of the history now, that in 2012 an advocacy group for the innocence of Lee Harvey Oswald surfaced and became part of the JFK landscape.  We, the OIC, are the voice of Oswald innocence and JFK truth in the world today.