Friday, October 16, 2015

Glenn V. 
8:21 PM (1 hour ago)


"When President Kennedy was shot I was standing on the front steps of the 
TSBD with William Shelley, Otis Williams, Mrs Sanders AND BILLY 
LOVELADY....I did not see Lee Oswald AT THAT TIME or any other time that 
day". 

Since you didn't understand what I wrote yesterday about your neglect of 
facts, I will make this one crystal clear: 

Present the evidence that this witness statement is incorrect. Present 
evidence that she lied, was wrong or otherwise didn't give a correct 
description of this situation. Present anything that contradicts her 
statement - and provide the evidence to back this up. I'm not intrested in 
your opinions, mind you. 

You talk about me having nothing, you scream about your arguments. Let's 
see, then, if you are able to put up here, Cinque? This one witness. Once 
we're done, if you have anything of value, anything worthwhile, we'll move 
on to the next one, OK? 

I'll be waiting. 


Ralph Cinque:

What is wrong with you, Viklund? 

How dare you present that to me without even saying who it was? 

I know who it was.  It was Sarah Stanton. But, why didn't you say so? And surely there are others here who don't know who it was, so why didn't you tell them? How dare you not? What the pluck is wrong with you?

And not only did you not say who said it, but you didn't say when she said it. She didn't make that statement on November 22, 1963 or close thereto. She made it on March 18, 1964, when the FBI came a'callin' again, demanding new statements from all the TSBD employees.

Now, don't you think by that time, the word was out that nobody saw Oswald in the doorway? And don't you think they put the FEAR OF GOD in these people that they didn't see Oswald in the doorway?

Let's consider the testimony of Carolyn Arnold and how it changed over time between November and March. 

On November 26, she said that she saw Oswald between the double-doors, which means: at the doorway. Unfortunately, they didn't let her make a statement in her own words. Instead, an FBI agent wrote down what he told her. And he said that she said that it was at 12:15. 

Well, even if it was 12:15, would it really have left enough time for Oswald to go upstairs, retrieve the rifle, assemble it, build the Sniper's Nest? But wait. Bonnie Ray Williams was up there on the 6th floor eating his fried chicken and drinking his Dr. Pepper until close to the assassination, so Oswald was out of luck anyway. 

But, I have good reason to think that it was the FBI agent who pushed the time back to 12:15 because in March 1964, Carolyn Arnold said that she didn't see Oswald at all and that she didn't get outside until 12:25. 

And they let the 12:25 ride since she didn't mention seeing Oswald, but why didn't they realize that someone like me would go back and read her first statement and then her second statement, and then realize that she saw Oswald between the double doors at 12:25?

Why, in March 1964 didn't Carolyn Arnold repeat what she had said about seeing Oswald between the double doors? It's because: word spread very quickly that nobody saw Oswald outside at or near the time of the assassination, and you had better not say it if you value your life.  

What exactly Sarah Stanton saw and was aware of at the time of the shooting, I don't claim to know. Oswald was probably the last to get out there, and I know damn well that he was the very first to leave the doorway. He left early. He had to be because how else could he beat Baker to the lunch room without being out of breath? Baker reached the steps just 10 seconds after the last shot- and he was running. That means that Oswald had to have a hefty head-start.  

So, either Sarah Stanton didn't see Oswald because all the action was to the front and she had no reason to turn around during the short time that he was there in the doorway

OR

Sarah Stanton did what Carolyn Arnold did and told them what they wanted to hear.  

But either way, it doesn't matter one bit because we have photographic proof that Oswald was in the doorway, and nobody's lip-flapping can possibly change it.  It's childish to think otherwise. WE HAVE A PHOTO OF HIM IN THE DOORWAY.





Viklund, if you want to deny plain, stark reality, go ahead. But, what you can't do is get away with it- not on my watch.   

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.