That is quite amazing that James Norwood is still claiming 7 witnesses when I sent him links showing that some of the people he is citing, such as James Jarman and Harold Norman, were never asked about the Doorman issue or shown the Altgens photo.
And James, you think it is so preposterous that they moved the hairline over? But, Jack White and many others, including Jim Fetzer, have said that they moved most of Oswald's face over on the Backyard photos- everything but the chin. And do you know who else said it? Lee Harvey Oswald. So, we are talking about the same thing except a smaller piece of the face. If they could do it once, why couldn't they do it twice?
And as far as the size goes, they could have made a much larger print and then done the alteration and then made a new negative from it.
James: focus: Doorman has the exact same hairline as Lovelady when he was 6 years younger. And we have a statement from Roy Lewis saying that Lovelady was practically bald on top at the time of the assassination. Here is that statement:
Why doesn't it matter to you?
What you are doing, James, is selectively citing evidence and selectively weighting evidence according to your own personal preference that Oswald NOT be Doorman- for reasons that are personal to you and not at all objective.
It's a Saul to Paul thing you have going on, but really, it's more like Paul to Saul.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.