Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

No. They thought they took him out too by converting him to someone else. But, they thought too much of their conversion. They didn't realize something: they failed; it stunk.

And what the Hell is your problem? Just because I said that these two can't be compared favorably, feature by feature, with the conclusion that they are the same person...

doesn't mean that it can never happen, that Doorman can't be compared favorably to anybody. He had to be somebody. He had to be exactly one person. And when you get to that person, then the features match. This is that person:

I'll spell it out for you: When every single feature matches between the two and there are no disconnects, that's when you know it's the same person.

The point is that you can do this for Oswald and Doorman; you cannot do it for Lovelady and Doorman. And this is what you have to do to determine a match. The process is very similar to how fingerprint analysis is done, where "points of identity" are sought between two samples. The following was written in regard to fingerprinting:

"There are as many as 150 ridge characteristics (points) in the average fingerprint. So how many points must a fingerprint examiner match in order to safely say the prints are indeed those of a particular suspect? The answer is surprising. There is no standard number required. In fact, the decision as to whether or not there is a match is left entirely to the individual examiner. However, individual departments and agencies may have their own set of standards in place that requires a certain number of points be matched before making a positive identification."

"Examiners make their determination based on he clarity of the print, the uniqueness of the print’s formations, and the examiner’s ability (or lack of) and experience. A less experienced examiner should match as many points as possible, whereas an examiner with many years of experience may settle on as few as a half dozen points that match."

It makes me realize why Nathan Darby's 14 point match between the inked fingerprint of Mac Wallace and a latent print left on a box in the Sniper's Nest meant bingo. This is by Alan Kent:

"Darby originally identified 14 matching points between the inked and latent prints that were given to him. While there is some debate on the amount of matching points necessary to make a definitive judgement on a match (The FBI suggests 8, some other countries require as many as 16, U.S. courts normally will accept 10-12, etc.), a 14 point match, testified to in court by a Certified Latent Print Examiner with proper experience and credentials, will generally clinch a case."

So, when we make the analogy to this, this is equivalent to a 120 point match in fingerprinting:

In other words, this is over the top: it's a slam-dunk. It's fuckin' Oswald.  And, it's all any reasonable, rational person needs to know that it's him.

To deny it is just a bold-faced lie. But, that's what you and yours do, what you are paid to do. You lie. Anyone who can't see that that is Oswald is either extremely stupid or extremely evil.