Even Robin Unger admits that this woman, on the left, is someone else. But that means, that there were two similarly dressed and similarly built women in the same place at the same time.
So, somebody was definitely promoting the idea that she was Babushka Lady, even though she was obviously older, and she had her scarf on differently.
So, the whole story about her is unsettling. The woman above was definitely NOT the Babushka Woman. She is not the one who took photos of JFK in the Kill Zone.
But, there is an image of the Babushka Woman that HAS to be her. It can't be anyone else. And that's the Babushka Woman in the Zapruder film behind Charles Brehm. This is a crop of the Costella frame 288.
As you can see, that is a very contrary image of Babushka Woman compared to how she looks in the Muchmore film.
So, the first thing I did was see how she looks in my Image of an Assassination DVD.
Obviously, she is completely blurred, but Brehm and his son aren't any better. Look how crisp JFK and Jackie look in comparison. Why is that? Did it have something to do with Zapruder's focus and camera settings?
But, we don't see anything comparable to that in the other films. Here, for instance, is Muchmore.
I think they deliberately blurred the far-ground in the Zapruder film to prevent us from clearly seeing these spectators.
And you can't tell me they didn't want us to get a good look at Brehm and his son. No, the one they didn't want us to get a good look at was Babushka Lady. Here's another frame from Muchmore:
So, they allowed us to see Babushka Lady clearly from behind but never from the front.
Let's look at some more Costella frames. Here is 277.
What? Don't tell me that Zapruder's camera did that. Look at that contrast between the Kennedys and the spectators! They weren't that far apart. Those spectators were deliberately blurred.
Here is Z-281.
What? Is that for real? It was the Bell and Howell Zoomatic, Model 414, an amateur camera. It had a zoom, but did it zoom-in on the Kennedys as much as that? Or were the people in the background deliberately blurred? But wait. Here is Z-309.
Mary doesn't look blurred at all. In fact, she looks about as clear as the Kennedys. And you can't say that Zapruder changed his settings.
So, what that tells me is that Brehm, his son, and Babushka were deliberately blurred in the Zapruder frames in which they appear. And the only one they really needed to blur was Babushka. They had no reason to blur Brehm and his son; they were "collateral damage."
I have to think that Babushka Lady was an agent, sent there to film Kennedy as he was being killed in the Kill Zone. Her outfit (the long coat and the tight scarf) was a disguise. And afterwards, the conspirators made sure we only saw her from the back or from the side, and the one picture of her from the front, taken by Zapruder, was deliberately blurred. This other frontal image is clearly that of another woman. But, it would have been bizarre if another woman, of the same size and dimensions, was there at the same time so similarly dressed and configured. Was she even for real? Why don't we have other images of her as we do of Babushka Lady?
And the fact that somebody colorized her tells you that they were trying to sell the idea that she was Babushka Lady. Why else color her? If she was just a nobody, you wouldn't color her. They did that to mislead, to confuse, as a dis-info tactic.
The set of images of Babushka Lady is turning into a smoking gun of its own- a smoking gun that they doggedly controlled her visibility in the photographic record, keeping her face out of view, except for a face that wasn't hers. Why? Because Babushka Lady took the highly altered and falsified Moorman photo.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.