Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Glenn V.

1:47 PM (59 minutes ago)

Ralph Cinque:
> Exactly 3 out of 7 of those were valid. The rest? Well, they were what I call:
>
> Little
> Itsy-bitsy
> Elective
> Subterfuges
>
  Be sure to read down vertically.

Doesn't matter if there was to be 3, 5, 7 or 9 of those witnesses.

Doesn't matter that the Altgens6 was handled and wired within minutes, not
allowing for ANY Cinque'esque fantasies.

Doesn't matter that Oswald himself said he was inside - and not during
that entire weekend to the world press SAID NOTHING ABOUT BEING OUTSIDE -
his obvious defence if your fantasies were to be true.

You simply neglect ALL OF IT. And comes up with no evidence to support
your fantasies. None.

That's exactly why you should be collecting stamps, Cinque. Instead of
repeatedly making a fool of yourself publicly. 

Ralph Cinque:

Viklund!!!  How many times do I have to tell you:

Out with Bill Shelley in front
Out with Bill Shelley in front
Out with Bill Shelley in front
Out with Bill Shelley in front
Out with Bill Shelley in front

That's what Oswald told police, and that's what you are neglecting. 

And you're saying it doesn't matter if 7 witnesses were claimed and then named, but it turns out only 3 were valid? Facts don't matter to you? Truth doesn't matter to you?

And the Altgens6 photo was NOT wired within minutes, and you saying that it was doesn't make it so. The Altgens6 photo was delayed. It was first shown on television by Walter Cronkite at 6:30 PM Eastern, which was 5:30 Central. If they had it since 1:00, why didn't they show it earlier that afternoon? CBS had programming going all afternoon, with Cronkite part of the time, and others in-between. Why didn't they show the Altgens6 photo before 6:30 Eastern if they had it since 2:00 Eastern? They were showing other images.