Backes, you stated that the Loveladys provided the Wedding photo to the HSCA.
So, the Loveladys (there is no apostrophe involved, you dumb pluck; it's plural, not possessive) provided the HSCA with copies of photos of Billy Lovelady.
First of all, photos? Plural? So, they provided the Wedding photo amongst others? What others? Why haven't we seen them?
The only photos of Lovelady that I am aware of are the alleged ones from 11/22/63, none of which are valid and all of which are in dispute; the wedding photo and the FBI photos. (Note: there is also a photo of him from 1967 by CBS and one from 1971 by Bob Jackson, both taken in the TSBD doorway, but neither one was ever included in the HSCA photo analysis or mentioned in their Final Report. And, they certainly didn't come from the Loveladys.)
So, where are the other photos of him from the Loveladys? You said they provided photos, plural. Do you want me to quote you again? Fine. "the Lovelady's (sic) provided the HSCA with copies of photos of Billy Lovelady."
So, what are the other photos to which you are referring? And what is the evidence for this claim at all? Where did you hear it? Where did you read it? Where is it written? Where is the record of it? Cite the source.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.