Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

"Cinque also lies about the Marriage photo of Billy Nolan Lovelady claiming that the conspirators who wanted to kill JFK and alter the photographic record could have crashed his wedding and made sure to get copies of the photographs of his weeding because they knew they would need it, because they knew years in advance where James Altgens would be and what he would photograph." Joseph Backes

Why are you so stupid, Backes? How did the HSCA get the Marriage photo, and if they could get it in 1976, wasn't it all the more likely that officials could get it in 1963? The more time passes, the harder it is to find old photos. It may have been in Lovelady's Air Force file. 

And, Jack White was definitely an advocate of Backyard photos alteration, that they moved Oswald's face to the body of another man. Are you denying that too, Backass?

And likewise, I am saying that they moved the "cap" of Lovelady, Young Lovelady, to Doorman.

What you see above is what I am saying, Backes, and it is what I have been saying for years. They moved the forehead, hairline, and top of Lovelady's head over, what I call his "cap". So, below that white line, we are looking at Oswald, pure Oswald, and above it, we are looking at Lovelady, Young Lovelady. 

And, you are completely out of your mind in saying that there is less than 3 years difference in age between these two photos of Lovelady.

And this statement below proves what I have suspected for a long time, that the so-called Wedding photo was NOT from Lovelady's wedding.

"Billy Nolan married Patricia Ruth Conner in Dallas, Texas in 1961."

Even in the HSCA Final Report, they dated the Wedding photo as 1959.

759. Photographs of Lovelady were furnished which varied in date from 1959 to 1977.

The 1959 photo to which they referred was the Wedding photo. That's the one. There is no other. So, it could not have been from Lovelady's own wedding in 1961.

It is my opinion that the photo dates earlier than that. The year I'm going with is 1957. Note that the HSCA offered no proof of the 1959 origin, and I reject it. But, I reject it as being of earlier origin, not later. 

Backes, you are a vicious, blood-soaked Kennedy-killer. You are vile, evil, and repugnant. And, you are NEVER speaking at a JFK conference again. You're through.