Friday, April 24, 2015

The picture of Young Lovelady is often referred to as the Wedding picture, with the implication that it was his wedding. But, that is impossible because he only got married once and that was in 1961, just two years before the assassination, and you know darn well there was more than a 2 year time span between these images. 


And the HSCA knew it too. They assigned the year 1959 to the image of Young Lovelady. But, they didn't substantiate it in any way. If it was taken at a wedding, it wasn't his wedding. But, since we have no supporting data about this, the only sensible thing is to date it according to his apparent age. And, on that basis, I have assigned the year 1957 to that picture. And since the image on the right was taken in 1964, it would be a 6 to 7 year time span, which looks about right, as he easily looks that much older on the right.

And since the image on the right was only 3 months after the assassination, it makes the likeness of the hair of Young Lovelady and Doorman utterly preposterous. It's preposterous even if you think Doorman was Lovelady, but that is preposterous in itself. 

  

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.