Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

So, the HSCA said that photos of Lovelady were "furnished" but it doesn't say by whom. Why? Don't you think that if the Loveladys had furnished them, they would have said so? That would sound good, wouldn't it? Surely, the Loveladys could be trusted to provide authentic pictures of him.

But, no pictures came from the Loveladys. The pictures came from the FBI and/or the CIA. It was 1976, and do you know who headed the CIA in 1976? George Herbert Walker Bush, who was standing outside the TSBD hours after the assassination. 

And, the President in 1976 was Gerald Ford, who changed the location of the bullet hole in JFK's back in order to accommodate the Single Bullet Theory. 

HSCA Chief Counsel Robert Blakey in 2003 wrote a scathing letter about CIA obstruction of the HSCA inquiry: "I now no longer believe anything the Agency told the committee any further than I can obtain substantial corroboration for it from outside the Agency for its veracity."

The Wedding photo of Lovelady was in government hands since before the assassination. It was used to give Doorman a new hairline. The alterers didn't know that Lovelady had lost a lot more hair by then. They couldn't tell because in the Altgens photo, Lovelady is covering up the top of his head with his hands.

They gave Oswald the hairline of Young Lovelady thinking that it hadn't changed much, but they thought wrong. 

Joseph Backes has stated repeatedly that the Loveladys provided photos to the HSCA, but that is a lie- a bold-faced lie. Not only is there no credible evidence that that happened, there is no evidence for it whatsoever.