Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

What's wrong with this picture?

What's wrong with it is that it was made by a British Op who is working the JFK coverup who goes by the name of Lance Upperpunk. 

Notice first that he implies that a year passed between the two images when actually it was just 3 months: November 22, 1963 to February 29, 1964. But, he rounded it off to one year. What the hay, right? But, I'm sure most of the world will agree that a three month time difference is so small as to be considered negligible.  


Next, notice that Doorman has his left shoulder slashed. He's in front of the guy next to him, so that guy can't be covering up any part of him. Yet, it sure looks slashed compared to what we see on Lovelady. Doorman is NOT anatomically whole, and the image of Lovelady only helps to demonstrate it. 

How about the difference in the t-shirts? Lovelady's is high and round, as it always was on Lovelady, whereas Doorman's descends into a vee-ish notch, the result of him habitually stretching it. Do you know who was first to recognize that? Oswald's Marine buddy Anthony Botelho.

What part of, "Because of this (the appearance of the t-shirt) Botelho immediately recognized Lee in the Altgens photo" do you not understand, Upperpunk?

What about the shape of the shirt sprawls? They're very different, with Lovelady's not being sprawled at all really, just unbuttoned. Oswald's is V shaped whereas Lovelady's is Y shaped. 

Here's a big one: look at the space between the eyes and the eye brows. It's a huge space on Lovelady but much narrower on Doorman, who has the same spacing as Oswald. 

The last difference I'll mention (although there are more) is that Lovelady's hairline was faked in the FBI photo, as proven by Mark Lane.

He obviously had much less hair on the left. Also the style and the cut look different, even though, as it states, they could have been taken on the very same day. The difference can't be dismissed due to bright glaring light or any other photographic factor. On the right, they faked his hairline. They lied. They cheated. And, it was all because they had used the wrong picture of him to model Doorman's hairline. 

Below is what Doorman must have looked like before they messed with him.

So, the only thing Upperpunk proved with his collage is that in the year of Our Lord 2015, the blood continues to flow. It is flowing copiously.