Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Did Lovelady have a birthmark on his forehead?

If he did, he must have had it removed.

Let's look at it up-close.

I doubt it's a birth mark because it's an unusual place to get one, and it would be an unusual shape for one. Besides, if it were a birthmark, don't you think it would have been removed when he was younger? No mention was ever made of Lovelady having a birthmark. And, no mention was ever made of Lovelady having a birthmark removed. According to the official story, it would have been removed between 1959 and 1963, since Doorman doesn't have it.

And that is Lovelady's forehead on Doorman. 

And, it must have been fabricated from that so-called Wedding picture because that's the only picture we have in which Lovelady's hairline was in that condition. And remember that his hairline was changing rapidly because he was a rapidly balding young man. 

I suspect the "birthmark" is just an artifact from the photo being manipulated. I really don't know how it got there, but I think it's likely that Lovelady was not born with any mark there.

Plus, they have means today by which they can remove facial lesions without leaving a scar, but I don't think they had such means then. It seems like there would be a scar if he underwent surgery.

Of course, the hairline above is just FBI flim-flam. After they doctored Doorman's hairline to match Young Lovelady's, they had to do the same thing to this image.

How come nobody mentioned this "birthmark" before? 

 That's not exactly true. KD Ruckman mentioned it. He just assumed that Lovelady really had a birthmark there that was removed, but I consider that extremely unlikely. I think it's an artifact.