Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

"Yes, the Lovelady photographs that "were furnished" to the HSCA came from the Loveladys. Again, I've got some interesting information I don't think anyone else has." Joseph Backes

Look, you stupid shit, there is ONE photo that we are even talking about, this one:

There is no other photo of Lovelady that could even theoretically have been supplied by the Loveladys. 

Are you claiming that the image from the Martin film was provided by the Loveladys? They didn't have the Martin, and there is no evidence that they even knew about the Martin film. 

At no time did either of the Loveladys ever acknowledge his presence out front at that time, and it conflicts with Lovelady's WC testimony in which he said he left the front immediately with Shelley. So, you know damn well that they didn't turn this picture over to the HSCA.

And, this series of photos was taken by the FBI and was turned over to the WC by the FBI, and they were never in the possession of the Loveladys. They didn't give Lovelady copies. So, you know they weren't supplied by the Loveladys to the HSCA.

And, the Groden photos of Lovelady were taken by Groden and turned over to the HSCA by Groden. So, they weren't provided by the Loveladys either. 

And that's all the photos of Lovelady they had that we know of. So, why do you keep referring to "photos" plural that the Loveladys provided to the HSCA? What other photo besides this one are you talking about?

You're stupid, Backes. You were born stupid, and you're going to stay that way. And you are never going to be invited to speak at a JFK conference again.