Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

What???  Are you completely out of your mind? You are still maintaining that the Loveladys provided the Wedding photo to the HSCA? And other photos too? 

There isn't a stitch of evidence for that. There aren't even any other photos of Lovelady, period. There's the Wedding photo, Gorilla Lovelady (who wasn't even Lovelady) FBI Lovelady, and Groden Lovelady. And that's it! Nothing else. We know of no other photos of Lovelady that the HSCA had and used. 

So now Backes is making up a scenario about the transfer of objects THAT DON'T EVEN EXIST. 


"Where's any proof that "they" had the marriage photo of Lovelady before the late 1970's when the Loveladys gave photos to the HSCA?" 

The Loveladys didn't give any photos to the HSCA. That you keep saying it only proves what a despicable bastard you are. And you're such a fool:  If you are going to claim that the Loveladys gave photos to the HSCA, the burden of proof is on YOU. You have to prove it. You have to provide the evidence for it. It's not a default to which you are entitled. How dare you say such a thing without the slightest bit of evidence?  

You're stupid, Backes. You were born stupid, and you're going to stay that way.