Why would Oswald, if he was an informant, say that a militant revolutionary group was doing it? How helpful is that? He presumably knew who was doing it. So, why not provide names, places, plans, etc. I mean explicit information. And why, on November 17, would the Director of the FBI respond in writing by ordering them to canvass informants within local racial and hate groups? Ask Abraham Bolden what happened when knowledge of the Chicago plot materialized. JFK's TRIP TO CHICAGO WAS CANCELLED. The same thing would have happened in Dallas. But, you're saying that instead they let JFK go there, and they let him ride around in an open limo?
And even if you want to say that the Director of the FBI wanted Kennedy dead, why would he expose himself to be so derelict in his duties? Why would he put in writing such a ridiculous and inadequate response? Read the damn thing again. Consider the actual content of it. It is not reasonable.
Again: Judyth Baker claims that that telex was actually sent by Oswald and that he told her that he sent it. But, I have provided ample reasons to demonstrate that that was impossible. So, what does it make of her statement? It makes it a lie. Judyth Baker is poison to the JFK truth movement. She is deadly poison. You should shun her. You should flee from her. Don't walk. Run.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.