Saturday, January 25, 2014

Backes, I have been talking about this for over a year, that it was the transference of Lovelady's forehead, hairline, and the top of his head to Doorman, what I have called his "cap." I've made it clear that the other facial features, including eyes, nose, mouth, and chin, are Oswald's. When I said "shape of his head" I was talking about the oval shape of the top of Doorman's head.



Do you see how the shape of the top of Oswald's head looks angular and geometric? Do you see how the shape of the top of Doorman's and Young Lovelady's heads look evenly curved? That is the shape I am talking about. And there has been no confusion about it. You are trying to create confusion where no confusion exists. 

It is the opposite of the Backyard photos. Jack White told us that it was another man's face, but they superimposed Oswald's face except that they left the other man's chin. Whoever that guy was, he had a very wide chin, much wider than Oswald's.  

But, with the Altgens photo, they started with Oswald's face since he was Doorman, and they superimposed the "cap" of Young Lovelady: his forehead on up. 

And that's it, Backes. That's how it went down. It's what I'm saying now, and it's what I have been saying all along. 

So stop being a sophist. Stop thinking you can dig yourself out of the hole you're in by parsing words. You can't. You are just showing how dastardly and corrupt you are. 

You're a God-damn Kennedy-killer, Backes, and I don't stomach Kennedy-killers. It's Oswald in the doorway, and that's certain: his clothes, his face, his body, his stance; everything but his cap. 


You can't get to this much likeness between two different men  in the universe we live in. And that includes the universe that you live in. You're just a God-damn Kennedy-killer. 




No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.