Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes, you moron, I'm comparing the diagonal line of the base of the limo to the bottom of the picture, and by that I mean the bottom of the film capture. Not to the physical bottom of the picture that includes the white border, but just the bottom of the what the film captured.

So, I am not talking about the physical bottom of the picture as you hold the Polaroid in your hand. I am talking about the bottom of the image capture, where it goes from dark to white. 

Now, there is an angle there. The line of the base of the limo is not parallel to the bottom of the image capture. That's the point we are making. And, I just learned from the Professor (and I'll warn you that now, he is really getting into this; he's hooked) that the angle that we see above is actually understated. The apparent angle that we see in the picture is less than what the real angle was. And he has just done a whole page of higher mathematics which proves it.

So, there is no doubt that Mary Moorman, who was standing perpendicular to Elm Street and the limo when she took her picture did not take the Moorman photo.