Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Glenn V.

9:28 AM (1 hour ago)

I pointed Cinque to my blog, which he then copied. I cited Norwoods
conclusions about Cinque, which then Cinque does his best to attribute to
me:

"That's a lie Viklund" etc.

It's pathetic to see a blog where opponents are given 10% of the letter
size which the loudmouth himself is using. Ridiculous.

Refute Norwood as much as you want, Cinque. But leave me out of your
ridiculous shenanigans. I'm not responsible for Norwoods conclusions.

Direct what you claim is a lie to Norwood, who correctly stated this.

Shame on you, Cinque.

I agree with Norwoods conclusions, you have nothing - unless you provide
evidence that all these people were lying. And this will never happen, of
course. 

Ralph Cinque:

If you agree with Norwood, if you're saying he was correct, then what the heck are you complaining about? 

I'm saying that anyone who claims that there were 7 witnesses who identified Doorman as Lovelady to the Warren Commission needs to name them. Norwood didn't, and I don't think there were that many.  

And Billy Lovelady was definitely not one of them because he was never asked. He was never asked, and he never said. He was only asked to draw an arrow to himself in the Altgens photo which he did, but he didn't draw it to Doorman. 

Look, there is only one arrow pointing to Doorman in the CE 369, and we know Frazier drew that one. So, you do the Math. Doesn't it mean that Lovelady had to draw his elsewhere?

The only other mark on the photo is a mark to Black Hole Man.

But don't despair. It's only been 52 years. So, it's not too late for you to find Lovelady's arrow. So start looking for it. 

Regarding the witnesses, they pre-screened them. There were 70 employees, and they went looking for people who would say that Doorman was Lovelady.

Look: with Frazier and Arce, Joseph Ball pointed to Doorman and asked them directly: "Who's he?" 

Everything hinged on their answer. Now, do you really think he did that not knowing what they were going to say?

Haven't you heard it said that lawyers never ask a question to which that they don't already know the answer?

Do you really think that Ball asked them blindly, not know what they were going to say? Exactly how naive are you? 

This is hypothetical:

Ball: Who is this? (points to Doorman) 
Arce: It's Lee Oswald.
Ball: Oswald? Are you sure?
Arce: Yes, absolutely. That's him. Slender guy; wide open shirt. He was dressed like that. He was the last one to get out there.
Ball: Well, I'll be darned. And here I thought all along that he was up on the 6th floor shooting at Kennedy. I've got to tell you; this changes everything. A lot of people are going to be darn surprised.
Arce: I just call 'em like I see 'em.
Ball: But listen, I may have to have you travel to Washington to tell the Commissioners. This is so big that they really should hear it with their own ears. Plus, they may have some questions for you.
Arce: Hey, you pay the bus fare, and I'll be good to go. 
Ball: OK, fine. But, don't forget to get a transfer.