Tuesday, October 13, 2015



Mark OBLAZNEY 

Oct 12 (4 hours ago)


On Monday, October 12, 2015 at 5:49:22 AM UTC+2, Ralph Cinque wrote: 
> Yes, but only one of them got framed, and that was Lee HARVEY Oswald.
Mrs. Oswald put 'her Lee' in a frame, too, huh, Raff* ?  You know, the one
you say is fake.

I've just figured you out, Ralph Cinque.  YOU cannot FACE REALITY.  Life
is but a dream for you; row, row, rowing (read: post, post, posting)
You're drifting along on your own little river, trying to tune the sitar
strings, but only snapping them.  Just let go, Ralph.  It WAS Billy Nolan
Lovelady standing where you think The Ozz was a-standin'.

Czechmate, Dr. Cinque.  No more moves, game over.  Hey, why don't you talk
about Roy Lewis again? 

Ralph Cinque:

It's not surprising, Pink, that you have a strange perception of mothers- since you have a strange perception of everything in your drug-strewn world. It's not surprising that it doesn't bother you in the least for a mother to hang pictures on the wall of her son when he was battered by police and under arrest and charged with double murder. She's even smiling. She looks proud. 




She was, reportedly, his mother, which meant that, presumably, she had all kinds of pictures of him from his good times, his happy times, his successful times etc. But, she chose to hang pictures of him battered by police from a monstrous nightmare of unparalleled horror. 

That's bad enough but what compounds it is that these were images that she couldn't get through any known means. One came out as a magazine cover. So, she could have hung the cover, but this wasn't a cover. So, where and how did she get it? It was art, but it was nothing that you could buy. So again: where and how did she get it? 

And the other was a press photo that got published in the newspapers. But, when, where, and how did she obtain it as an 8X10 that she could hang on the wall?

The third photo of Oswald as a young Marine- I suppose he could have sent it to her. But, did he? I doubt it. Where's the evidence?

These questions don't interest you, do they, Pink? And it's precisely because: you're pink. 

But, get something into your feeble, pink brain, Pink:  

I never said the photo was fake. I never said she wasn't there; and I never said she didn't have those photos hanging on the wall. I just wanted to know where she got them. I also claimed that:

1) She wasn't Oswald's biological mother, and you just have to read John Armstrong for proof of that. 

2) She must have had connections to people who were helping her maintain the illusion of being his mother, which resulted in her getting those pictures. She had help. 

But, why would the people helping her do this masquerade fail to appreciate the macbreness of hanging morbid pictures of her son on the wall?  How unmotherly is that?

Well, the reason is that they didn't think about it. They were thinking about other things: about making her look like she was focused on the investigation and solving the case. And, it did brand her. It was a marketing ploy. They were marketing her as "Oswald's mother" and they put up pictures that people associate with Oswald. 

Besides, if she hung nice pictures; happy pictures; gentle pictures; joyful pictures; hopeful pictures; laughter pictures- that would have humanized Oswald. And they certainly didn't want that. They didn't want it, and she didn't want it. Both wanted the viewer to focus on Oswald the killer, Oswald the psychopath, Oswald the lonenut assassin. 

But still, it was stupid, because it just wasn't motherly. It wasn't real. That Marguerite was just a persona. She was an act, a character. It was a charade. 

And no, Pink. This collage is like the cross that stops Dracula in his tracks, where YOU would be Dracula.



And the comparison to Dracula is not an exaggerated metaphor at all because you are a devil worshipper. You even make the sign of the devil.




And look: you're even in pink. Of course you are.

But no, I'm not letting go, Pink- not when I have my hands around the scrawny neck of JFK officialdom. You can't get arrested for murdering an idea, can you? I don't think so. And that idea- that 52 year old evil wicked lie- has lived far too long already.   

But, I won't deny that struggling against people like you does energize me; it increases my output. So, keep it up, and try to get Farley back too. What happened to him? Did he run for the hills? Or is he hiding in his dungeon? Maybe he needs a new "lance". 









No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.