Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Rick Buciarelli is completely full of it. He told someone that this is an image of James Bookhout, but it is not an image of James Bookhout. It is a CLAIMED image of James Bookhout. Anyone can claim anything. 

What is the basis for believing that that is James Bookhout? Because the National Archives says so? That is a basis to doubt it. But, what is certainly true is that that is Will Fritz talking right behind that guy. Do you think James Bookhout would be more interested in sucking on God-damn pipe than hearing what Will Fritz had to say? We have to presume that Fritz was talking about the case, right? Wasn't Bookhout interested? And if you blow that image up, you can see that it's been highly altered and manipulated and doctored. Look how weird his hair is. You can see how they filled it in in front. Look how weird his glasses are. 

And it's very unlikely that James Bookhout smoked a pipe. He lived to practically 100, and pipe smokers don't do that. 

Rick also says the guy on the far right wearing glasses in this image is Bookhout.

I don't know who he means, presumably one of these guys.

So, take your pick, but none of them are Bookhout. Look: the only images we have with which to compare are the yearbook images.

And it's clear that none of those guys were Bookhout.

And that image of them, by the way, was from the Midnight Press Conference, and Bookhout DENIED attending the Midnight Press Conference. He said under oath to the Warren Commission that he didn't attend. 


The only images of James Bookhout from the JFK assassination are the ones that we found, and they are not official.

  
Look:

And keep in mind that Bookhout said he was in that exact spot, following Oswald's stretcher out of the jail office and into the garage. It's got to be him. 

I don't know if Rick Buciarelli is just gullible and stupid, or if he's a troll. You should understand that the complete exposure of the official JFK narrative as fraud would cause a tremendous amount of upheaval because the government and the media have been lying about it for over half a century. And that's why they are still fighting it hard, and they will continue to fight it. And I don't doubt that they would kill again over it. The last person I suspect was killed over it was James Altgens in 1995, but there might have been someone else since then that I don't know about. They killed Epstein, didn't they? You don't believe he killed himself, do you? Well, exposure of JFK truth would cause every bit as much upheaval as exposure of Epstein's friends and what they did with him.