Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

So, now we have an even playing field. I'm done with Facebook, and I am operating from here. And what I have been informed is that my enemies, including the Idiot Backes, that weird Clark Rob who is obsessed with cross-dressing, and the evil bpete, have all been hitting the Report button on me, even though in terms of harassment, they have exceeded anything I've done by a country mile. It's laughable to even compare. These great JFK researchers spend their time making bizarre obscene images of me. This is their way of plumbing the truths about JFK.

Well, they don't give a shit about JFK, and they don't give a shit about JFK truth. The idea that JFK would ever get justice from Joseph Backes is so ridiculous, it is Orwellian. And they- Backes, Rob, and bpete- are all working for the same people that Orwell tried to warn us about.

I'm here to tell each of you- and the three of you together- that you can't beat me. You can't beat me singly, and you can't beat me as team. I am smarter than you, stronger than you are; and most important, I am right: Oswald WAS standing in the doorway, and you three stooges are powerless to hold that back.

I came here this morning intending to use Facebook, of course, and finding numerous notices of being censored, and this time, it detailed the multiple posts that were in violation, and it named the individuals who had registered complaints, most recently Joseph Backes and Clark Rob. And, they showed the posts that were in violation, and they weren't even that bad. No curse words, nothing vile, just strong criticism.

In fact, I have to wonder if Facebook, which reportedly has close cooperative ties to government agencies like the CIA and FBI, censoring me? Is Facebook itself trying to stifle JFK truth? That's very possible.

But, this blogger is like the Wild, Wild West where anything goes, and in a way, I'm glad this happened. I feel liberated. Unchained. So now, let's rumble, moe-foes, and better keep your faces covered.

My intent this morning was to comment further on the issue of Buell Frazier's location in the doorway. I've pointed out that in his WC testimony, Frazier made 7 references to being on the steps, and no one who was standing "back in the shadows" on the landing would do that. Plus, he specifically referenced being one step down from the top.

That image that bpete posted is ridiculous. This is not Buell Frazier.

 

And, as I've pointed out, someone, and probably not bpete but someone he's working with, altered that guy to slim him down:

So, on the left, you have Skinny Frazier, then there's the he-man in the middle, and on the right is what they did to slim him down and lengthen his face so that he could pass for Frazier. It's very similar to what they did to the Lovelady figure from the Dallas PD footage:

We actually have at 4 different versions of the above image. And by the way, he wasn't Lovelady, and he wasn't really there on 11/22/63.

You know, I have to say that I am liking this already. I get to place the actual images rather than a link. I can say anything I want. Why did I wait so long? I should have come here on my own accord. These guys did me a favor.

But, what I was going to get to this morning is: Why would anyone stand back in the shadows to watch a motorcade? It was a beautiful sunny day, and after being indoors all morning in that dank old building, wouldn't you want to stand in the sun? And how good would your visibility be from way back in the shadows? Not very. How good would your peripheral view be? It would be very restricted because you can't see through a wall. There was room on those steps, so why wouldn't Frazier come down? He would have. He did.

I"m going to post this before I lose it, but I'll continue.