Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Alright, so now we know that Joseph Backass the researcher, the investigator, the JFK analyst, thinks that it is a legitimate FBI telex that J. Edgar Hoover sent and that it's based on information that he received from none other than Lee Harvey Oswald. So, let's examine it as the work of J. Edgar Hoover. 

First, Hoover said that it was a threat to "assisinate" President Kennedy in Dallas on November 22 or 23. Regarding the spelling error, no matter how bad Hoover's spelling was, you don't think that he actually sat down in front of the telex and typed it out himself, do you, Backes? Don't you think that somebody else did that? So, even if his original note had such appalling spelling, wouldn't the operator have fixed it? Wouldn't the operator have been used to fixing such errors? Or, do you think the operator just typed it out exactly as Hoover wrote it, errors and all? 

And if the attack was going to take place in Dallas, wouldn't it have to have been on November 22? Why bring up November 23? Wasn't Kennedy going to spend the night in San Antonio? So, if the attack was going to be in Dallas, it had to be the 22nd? Right? And didn't Hoover know that? 

Continuing, the letter says that a "militant revolutionary group" was going to attack the President. So, you think Hoover got that from Oswald? But, why would Oswald say it was a "militant revolutionary group"? If Oswald knew anything, why wouldn't he be specific and say exactly who it was? Why wouldn't he name names? Why would he say a militant revolutionary group? And how is that the least bit helpful? If the source isn't specific, what are you supposed to do with "militant revolutionary group"? 

Then, there is a reference to JFK's "proposed" trip to Dallas on November 22-23. Proposed? Listen up, Backes: if it's 6 months or a year away, you can talk about the trip being "proposed." But, when it's just a few days off, and this was November 17, it's way beyond the point of "proposed." It isn't a "proposed" trip; it is a scheduled trip; it is in the hopper. Nobody would use the word "proposed" when it's that close- not Hoover, not Oswald, and not anybody. 

Now, are you starting to see why I think the whole thing is a hoax?

Then it has the word "logical" instead of "local" and it's hard to imagine J. Edgar Hoover making that mistake. Then, it refers to "racial and hate groups." So, it goes from "militant revolutionary groups" to "racial and hate groups" as if there is a natural connection between the two. But why? Racial groups are like the Ku Klux Klan. And hate groups are like, I don't know, anti-gay groups? (Sorry for touching a nerve.) But, what the hell? How is any of this relevant? How would it have been helpful? For Christ's sake: if he thought the President's life was in danger, and it was already November 17,  what good would it do to start looking into hate groups on November 17? At that point, wouldn't you just cancel the President's trip? And why would you put IN WRITING such a stupid course of action as the letter orders?

You're dumb as dirt, Backes. That letter could not possibly have been sent by Oswald (which you admit) but it makes absolutely no sense for it to have been sent by FBI Director J. Edgar Hoover either. 

What does it leave? It leaves fraud, Backes. It's a fraudulent letter. It's a hoax.  It happens. 

But go ahead, say it again. Tell us why you think it's a real telex from J. Edgar Hoover to the SACs based on information provided by Lee Harvey Oswald. You dumb fuck.