Saturday, November 22, 2014

Hey Backass! I live in Texas. And I have been to LBJ's ranch. And it's not in Dallas. So, Kennedy was going to spend the night there, he would have been nowhere near Dallas. And that means that a reference to an assassination in Dallas on November 22 or 23 makes no sense. Idiot.

And no Backes! There is no such thing as "logical racial and hate group informants." As opposed to what? The illogical ones? Whoever wrote it meant "local racial and hate group informants."

And yes, I get it that the warning referred to a "militant revolutionary group" (one wonders why he didn't mention which one) and the instructions referred to "racial and hate groups" but still, the "Director" was linking them together. So, why would the Director think that a reference to "a militant revolutionary group" called for the examining of all "racial and hate groups" nationwide- as if such a thing was possible within a few days time?

And, I've got bad news for you, Backes. David Reitzes has attacked this issue of the telex and the treatment of it in the movie JFK.


  
Now, don't be distracted by his dashing good looks, asshole.

But, David Reitzes has provided the whole history of this famous telex. It turns out that it is not authentic at all. There is no telex. It's just a mock-up. This whole thing links back to a former night clerk at the New Orleans FBI office by the name of William Walter. He is the one and only person on Earth who ever said anything about the telex. And he never had the telex or a copy of it. Walter created the telex that we have-- FROM MEMORY. I kid you not. And apparently, the spelling errors were his, unless you want to say that he recalled them and was just trying to be authentic. 

"Walter admitted that he did not publicly allege the existence of this telex until 1968. At that time, the FBI instituted an investigation that failed to find any corroboration for Walter's story. According to the Bureau, no record of a teletype or any other kind of communication reporting that there would be an attempt to assassinate President Kennedy in Texas could be found. Over 50 FBI employees of the New Orleans FBI office were interviewed by the Bureau, and none of them stated that they had any knowledge of any such teletype. . . ."

"Walter advised the committee that he did not know of anyone who could definitely substantiate his teletype allegation, although he suggested that his former wife, Sharon Covert, who also had worked for the FBI in New Orleans, might be able to do so. Sharon Covert, however, advised the committee that she could not support any of Walter's allegations and that Walter had never mentioned his allegations to her during their marriage."

"More fundamentally, however, the committee was led to distrust Walter's account of the assassination teletype because of his claim that it had been addressed to the special agents in charge of every FBI field office. The committee found it difficult to believe that such a message could have been sent without someone 15 years later -- a special agent in charge or an employee who might have seen the teletype -- coming forward in support of Walter's claim." 

"The committee declined to believe that that many employees of the FBI would have remained silent for such a long time. Instead, the committee was led to question Walter's credibility. The committee concluded that Walter's allegations were unfounded."

Now get this, asshole:

"William Walter told Jim Garrison in 1968 that he had seen such a teletype, but he could not produce a copy of it. Rather, he composed a mock teletype that he said reconstructed the original as best he could remember."

That's all the telex is, moron: the recreation by one guy of a document that he alone claimed to see and which he reproduced (which is to say typed) from memory. 

It means that that so-called "telex" is not a telex at all. It wasn't sent from anywhere. It came from the mind of William Walter. 

And the HSCA made a good point: since it was supposedly sent to every Special Agent in Charge of every FBI office in the country, how come not a single one of them came forward to confirm Walter's story? You mean to say that they got to every single one of them or that every single one of them was corrupt?

In discovering this, I have to say that the veracity of the telex has sunk even lower, which is quite amazing since I never thought that was possible.

But, let's let David Reitzes speak for himself:

http://www.jfk-online.com/jfk100telex.html

And let the record show that I know that David Reitzes is a lone-nutter, a supporter of the official story, and very much a shill for it. And I fight him tooth and nail- just as I do you, Backes.  
But, on this particular matter, DAVID REITZES IS RIGHT: there is no reason to take that telex seriously because it isn't even real. 

And this is not a problem for me because I have agreed with lone-nutters before on specific issues. For instance, they say that Oswald took the bus and cab, and I say he took the bus and cab. They say that Oswald didn't change his shirt, and I say he didn't change his shirt. They say that Oswald had no Coke when Baker and Truly saw him in the lunch room, and I say he had no Coke when they saw him in the lunch room.  

And that is not a complete list. There is, unfortunately, a long list of things that CTs have gotten wrong- thanks to people like Joseph Backes, Judyth Baker, and others.

My job is to clear the air, and that is what I am doing. In regard to the JFK assassination, Lee Harvey Oswald was NOT an informant. He was just a patsy, and nothing more. And in regard to everything in life, you, Backes, are a fucking idiot.    




     

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.