Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Look at whom Backes calls "King" and whom he calls "fool." 

Damn straight. And I don't mind a bit that he is reproducing the debate on his blog. Let everyone know what is going on.

This is a very polarized thing. What I am saying is that Oswald was a patsy. He was not a conspirator; he was not a collaborator; and neither was he an under-cover agent probing the plot from the inside, pretending to go along. 

What Richard Hooke is claiming is that Oswald was in on it up to his neck, working with and cooperating with the killers, both before and after the shooting, except that at the last minute he refrained from shooting Kennedy. And for that, Hooke thinks he deserves a medal. And it would mean that Oswald stayed under-cover even after his arrest, that he flagrantly and repeatedly lied to police about a great many things and hid all that he knew about the plot, which was everything. So, he refused to come out from under-cover even when he was in police custody. 

It is an outrageous and preposterous tale, and being an Oswald defender, of course I condemn it. 

Backes is just taking delight in the dispute. If he were a serious researcher, he would address the issue being debated and take a stand. But, he doesn't because he doesn't care. He only cares about disparaging me. But, I am certain that all rational people who hear both sides will see it my way. So, post away, Backes. 

It's a shame what happened to Richard Hooke because he made some very nice charts about Oswald in the doorway. And he made one discovery that really is of monumental importance: the fact that Lovelady was Black Hole Man in the Altgens photo.

And I think it is unlikely that I would have discovered Lovelady's arrow in CE 369 if Richard hadn't give me a heads-up about Lovelady being Black Hole Man.

The discovery of that arrow (actually, just the tail of the arrow; the rest was drawn black-on-black in the black space, as Lovelady was instructed to do by Joseph Ball) is of great historical importance because prior to that, people were freely attributing Frazier's arrow to Lovelady.  

But, despite those early contributions of Richard Hooke which are so valuable, what he is doing now is extremely detrimental, and I cannot tolerate it. Oswald was not an under-cover agent in the JFK assassination, pretending to work with the plotters. He was just a patsy in the JFK assassination. They didn't need him for anything except to be patsy, and they didn't use him for anything except as patsy.