Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes didn't like my post about Altgens6 and Altgens7.  But, Jim Fetzer liked it a lot. He liked it so much he put together a followup article consisting of that post of mine, plus more from Larry Rivera about the motorcycle cops going up the Grassy Knoll (which they only did because, like everyone else, they thought the shots came from there) and more by Jim. You can see it here:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/11/18/more-jfk-mysteries-solved-the-second-limo-stop-and-holding-back-the-altgens6/

The people who organized the assassination of JFK knew what they were doing. And what they were doing was attacking JFK from multiple sites and angles in Dealey Plaza. But, they knew they had to make it look like the attack came from just one man in one spot: the Sniper's Nest. THEY KNEW, AHEAD OF TIME, THAT THE PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD MIGHT CONFLICT WITH THE STORY THEY WERE TRYING TO TELL. 

And that is why they were prepared ahead of time to alter the photographic record as needed. They had agents there in Dealey Plaza who would quickly confiscate cameras from the public. And they made sure that professionals like James Altgens were under their control as well. 

Altgens worked for the AP, which had very close ties to the CIA. So, when Altgens turned over his photos, you know that they were going to be scrutinized by CIA assets. They realized ahead of time that they might have to alter photos and would probably have to. 

And again, it's obvious from the circumstances. They conducted a triangulated, military-style ambush which they had to blame on one man.  So, how could they just assume that pictures taken of it would not be a problem? They HAD to be ready to doctor photos, and they knew that going in. Surely, they had a crack alteration team waiting, and I mean right there in downtown Dallas. It may well have been at Jaggars/Chiles/Stovall, Oswald's former employer. 

Remember that photographic alteration goes back at least to the Civil War. The idea that they couldn't alter the Altgens photo and would not have been prepared to alter it is ridiculous.

And the alterations that were done to it are absolutely grotesque.

The above crop is from the HSCA, and it is a House of Horrors, with a headless guy, a guy with both arms folded across his chest who strangely has a white blob over his face which some are calling a third arm, a set of Siamese twins conjoined at the shoulders, an African-American woman with hair the size of a beehive, a boy who is mysteriously elevated when there was nothing for him to be standing on, and an African-American man in profile who absolutely was not there where we see him. He was against the wall and facing the other way, and he was largely or wholly out of view to Altgens, where that image of him is totally and completely fictitious. 

That is 7 things right there, and if they did even 1 of them, it means they altered the photo. But, they did all 7, and I proved it at the Altgens Reenactment in 2012.

And to say that it couldn't have happened because of insufficient time is stupid. We can see that it happened, so there must have been sufficient time. 

There is NO basis to deny this. The Altgens photo was altered just as surely as the Zapruder film was altered.