Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Now, as to the latest slime from bpunk, I have told him a million times- and others have told him as well- that the list in the Fritz Note is NOT chronological. And that's why Fritz drew an arrow to indicate which came first:

I extended the arrow for clarity, but you can see that "to 1st floor had lunch" is what Fritz was pointing to as the first thing that happened. And that is the first thing that happened. Oswald ate lunch in the domino room about 12:15, and he cited Junior Jarman and Harold Norman to have been milling around at the time. 

And it's quite true that Oswald didn't identify himself in Altgens6 but that's because he didn't know about Altgens6, and they didn't show him Altgens6. AND WHY DIDN'T THEY? They had it. They knew about the controversy, the unresolved question. THE FBI VISITED LOVELADY THE EVENING OF NOVEMBER 23 WITH A PICTURE OF DOORMAN AS BIG AS A DESK, ACCORDING TO LOVELADY'S WIFE, SO WHY DIDN'T THEY DO THE SAME WITH OSWALD?

Look, if you've got an image, and you know it has to be one of two guys, don't you show it to both of them? Why would you show it to just one? 

And, "out with Bill Shelley in front" HAD to refer to DURING the assassination since Shelley wasn't out there after the assassination, having left with Lovelady and having seen Baker climb the steps from a distance. And how could Oswald's alibi NOT be included in Fritz notes? How could Fritz not have asked Oswald, "Where were you at the time of the shooting?" and how could he not have written down Oswald's response? 

And now, bpunk is admitting that he doesn't really believe that Lovelady heaped his arrow on top of Frazier's, that it's just an artifact of some lightening that I did. Well, in this case, you have to look at the finished product, which is this:

Now, is that one arrow or two, asshole? That's the only question. The rest is just bull shit spewing from a blood-soaked Kennedy-killer: yourself. 

Now, this settles it. That is one fucking arrow, asshole, and you damn well know it. 

Then, the stupid jerk bpunk quotes an FBI statement about a woman who supposedly left the building at 11:45 and didn't return until 12:40 who said that "she didn't see Lee Harvey Oswald at the time the President was shot." Well, if she wasn't there, how could she? How could she see anybody? Wasn't it all over by 12:40? Wasn't Oswald gone from Dealey Plaza by 12:40? What was the point of saying that? What was the point of the statement? That statement was written by an FBI agent, who apparently didn't realize the stupidity of what he was saying, and bpunk still doesn't realize it in 2014. 

Then the punk quotes some people who were not employees of the TSBD who were not in Dealey Plaza at the time of the shooting. He actually put up this statement: "I did not see Lee Harvey Oswald at the time President Kennedy was shot. I was not at any time on November 22 at the TSBD."

Huh? Then what was the point of obtaining that statement? Wasn't it a waste of paper? 

Then, another guy said he was having lunch at the Blue Front restaurant and never saw LHO at any time on 11/22. Then who cares? What's the point?

I am not going to devote any more time to this bull shit. Most of the employees of the TSBD were outside watching the motorcade while a few watched it from the windows. A few were inside doing other things- just weren't interested. And some undoubtedly were somewhere else, but that's true any day of the week. But, none of it has any bearing on who the man in the doorway was. And the man in the doorway was undoubtedly Lee Harvey Oswald. He is wearing Oswald's clothes, the unbuttoned, sprawled-open outer shirt over the white t-shirt which, from being stretched, notched down. 

You see that vee there on each t-shirt? It's the same t-shirt. What, you think Lovelady wore a t-shirt like that? No fucking way!

You see the collar and the fold on each? It's the same collar and the same fold. It's the same shirt. You think Lovelady's shirt acted like that? No fucking way!

You see the matching shirt sprawls? It's the same fucking sprawl. You think that was Lovelady on the right? That he was decked out exactly the same as Oswald on 11/22/63? You're out of your fucking mind. 

Here it is again:

It's the same get-up and the same guy. It can't not be. 

How is that not the same arrangement? It's exactly the same. It's the same outfit and the same guy. 

Look: it is Oswald in the doorway just as surely as it is Christ on the proverbial Cross. And, anyone who denies it at this juncture, with all the evidence that has been presented, including photographic evidence and much more, is nothing but a vicious blood-soaked Kennedy-killer.