Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Here is my response to another senior member, Staffan Westerberg. 

Staffan, here it is a little larger. I can't go much bigger because it gets distorted. 

But, you see the black mark on the forearm, which is the tail of the arrow, which I first saw two years ago. And then in the black there is the head. Keep in mind that the other arrow- the big one on the left side pointing to Doorman- is definitely Frazier's arrow. 

What I am pointing to on Black Hole Man is the only contender there is for Lovelady's arrow. It's not as though there is something else that looks more promising. There is nothing else, period. 

One Op is trying to claim that Lovelady heaped his arrow on top of Frazier's- that what we have been calling one arrow is really two. But, that is obviously a desperate ploy that makes no sense in terms of what we see or in terms of human behavior- what a person would do in that situation. Obviously, the whole point would be to distinguish the arrows. 

So, you should look at this realizing that it is the only game in town. This is Lovelady's arrow drawn to himself in the Altgens photo. And it means, automatically, that Lovelady was conceding that Doorman was Oswald. It's like a toggle switch because if Doorman wasn't Lovelady, he had to be Oswald. There is no other candidate. Ralph