Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

The image of Toni Glover and her mother that I am most interested in is the one from the Hughes film because that is the one that covers up Lee Harvey Oswald.

There are no good versions of this, and this one is heavily photoshopped. But, if you look above Toni's head, you do see the auburn hair of her mother, who was standing on the pedestal with her. And if you look on each side of Toni, you see a dark color which represents her mother's coat. It's ever so slightly different in shade from the darkness of the doorway. But, take note that they are both covering up Oswald. The Doorman that we see hovering above Roy Lewis is fake. He wasn't there. So, why did they put him there? It's because, at the time, they were trying to match the Altgens photo.

It looks like Doorman is hovering above Roy Lewis, right? But, he wasn't, and you only have to look at Wiegman to get the real picture. 

That was the reality. That is where everybody was. And I mean in Altgens, Hughes, and Wiegman. Nobody moved. Doorman's position in Altgens is deceiving. 

It's deceiving because the west side of the doorway was cut off to Altgens because of his angular view and the parallax effect, which seemed to cinch Doorman up to the west column. The west column seems to be covering up his right shoulder, as if he were behind it, but he was nowhere near it. 

It was solely due to Altgens' angular line of sight. 

What we see of Roy Lewis in the Altgens photo is completely false. Roy Lewis was against the west wall at the time, and he was facing and looking west, just as we see him doing in Wiegman.

Do you know what the time difference was between Wiegman and Altgens? Maybe a second. For all practical purposes, they were taken simultaneously. You can't assume any movement (relocating) of the figures. Nobody was wandering around that doorway. Above is the reality of what Roy Lewis was doing- in both Wiegman and Altgens. So, why is Roy Lewis facing the other way in Altgens?

Because it's false. They stuck that image of Roy Lewis in there. And they got it from the Willis frame. 

That's the same image, cropped and blown up in Altgens.

Again: Roy Lewis was almost completely out of view to Altgens because of the parallax effect.

So, the Roy Lewis that we see in Altgens is fake, but that's what they were shooting for in falsifying Hughes. So, they modeled the falsification they were doing in Hughes by the falsification they did in Altgens.

Why is Roy Lewis' shirt blue in Hughes when it appears to be beige in Willis?

Photoshopping! That's why. They wanted to have a good contrast between his shirt and Doorman's shirt, so they went with blue. 

But, that's just in that heavily photoshopped version. Here is another version of Hughes in which RL's shirt does look beige.

I realize that all this is enough to make your head spin, but it's not my fault. There was an incredible amount of photographic fakery done. As I've said, the JFK assassination is, undoubtedly, the most photographically altered event of all time. 

But, I want you to focus on their relative sizes. Roy Lewis was a 6'3" stocky, burly guy while Oswald was 5'9 and gaunt and skinny. So, why does the Doorman figure hovering above Roy Lewis look so much bigger than Roy? It's because it's FAKE, FAKE, FAKE. And regarding Toni, all we see of her mother here is her hair. Doesn't it look like Toni has a brown wig on? That's her mother's hair. But, we don't see anything else of her mother. But, even Toni looks TOO BIG. She was an 11 year old girl. 11 years old. That's just one year more than 10. THEY MADE SURE SHE WAS BIG ENOUGH TO COVER UP THE REAL OSWALD WHO WAS STANDING IN THE CENTER OF THE DOORWAY.

Is it terribly mind-boggling? Yes, of course. It took me months to sort it out.  And that's what they were counting on, that nobody's mind would go there, that it was too brazen, too wild for anyone to think that they would actually do all that. But, they actually did.