So, what is going on there?
Doorman was way back on the top landing, while Lewis was way forward on a low
step. The steps are both steep and long, and climbing them really sets you back.
So, how could Doorman's cuff wind up in front of Roy Lewis' neck? Did Doorman
have 12 foot arms?
Some have tried to resolve this innocently by saying
that it isn't Doorman's arm at all, that what we think is a cuff is actually the
tightly rolled-up sleeve of a man, another African-American man, whose only
manifestation in the picture is his arm, and whose bare skin tone came out on
film exactly the same as the shirt he was wearing. That is what Joseph Backes
maintains.
I prefer not to go that route, myself. What I think happened
is that the face of Roy Lewis was inserted into the picture, that Roy Lewis was
not visible to Altgens.
In the Wiegman film, we can see that Roy Lewis
was standing right against the west wall with his hand on the molding of the
column. He is only, and always, turned and looking west, not east, so opposite
to Altgens. And from his position in Wiegman, I maintain that Lewis would have
been invisible to Altgens. I've drawn a line showing the extent to which
Altgens' visual field was cut off to Altgens.

This diagram is accurate.
No one has ever denied that much of the doorway was cut off to Altgens' view.
Even Doorman was partially cut off- his right shoulder- and he was standing in
the center of the doorway. So, if a guy standing in the center was partially cut
off, you know that a large part of the doorway was cut off.
If Roy Lewis
was standing against the wall in Altgens as he was in Wiegman, then he was
definitely cut off to Altgens. As I see it, the only way my opponenets can
defend Lewis' visibility in Altgens is to say that he moved. Not just turned,
but physically moved, as in relocated.
But, how much time was there
between Altgens and the start of Wiegman? They were so close that people argue
about which came first. They may have been just one second apart, so arguing a
physical movement for Lewis is difficult, and so far nobody has done it.
I think the time has come to seriously consider photographic alteration
as an explanation for some of what we see in the Altgens
photo.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.