Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

So, I post a 1950s Polaroid image of Brigit Bardot, but is that good enough for Backes? No, he ignores it. Maybe he figures he can because it doesn't say 1950s.  Then, let's bump it up a notch:

https://www.etsy.com/listing/216172705/1950s-vintage-polaroid-picture-of-two 

And here's an example of one those vintage Polaroids, and it says from the 1950s.  It also says Polaroid. 

It's still light-years better than the Moorman photo.

Let's do one more, just to give Backshit a taste of his own bile:

Again: it says 1950s vintage Polaroid.

https://www.etsy.com/listing/216171419/1950s-vintage-polaroid-photo-man-and-two?ref=related-0


Here is the dragon spewing his bile about the 1970s and 80s:

even the 1970's and 1980's era of Polaroid photographs from the one touch model is considered "old." It's 2015, asshole! They make cameras that don't even use film now! The idea of even using film is considered ancient. We're in the digital era of photography. 

They have long stopped making the model Mary Moorman used, and they have long stopped making the type of film she used.

The story is the same with the 1970's and 1980's era one touch Polaroid cameras.

They make one that will print off a small business card size photograph. But, again, the camera, film, and the photograph you get is a completely different system than what Mary Moorman had.

We're not talking about the 1970s and 80s, Backes.  You're stupid! You were born stupid; you live stupid; and you'll stay stupid - until your last breath. You don't have the mental faculties to do this.