Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I am having a very nice exchange with Mark Shaw,  who is the lawyer who wrote the book on the murder of Dorothy Kilgallen and is now promoting it. I reached out to him about the innocence of Jack Ruby, and he is willing to study my materials. This is a  letter I sent to him. He sent me something to look at that is apropos: 

OK, I'll look at it, Mark. But please consider this: they killed Dorothy Kilgallen. We both know that. But why? Is it because she found out about Jack Ruby's ties to the Mafia? No way. They want us to think that he had ties to the Mafia. They want us to think that he was a gunrunner. And do you know about  the letter concerning Jack Rubenstein working for Richard Nixon? It's bogus. It's from the 1940s, and it contains a zip code, which weren't started until 1960. I think that Dorothy Kilgallen found out from talking to him that Ruby was out of his mind, that he was delusional and totally incompetent. She must have realized that nobody would entrust this guy to do anything, let alone shoot someone in a small crowded space. I don't say that she figured it out all the way, that it was a complete setup, that Ruby was a deranged patsy and nothing more, that he said he didn't remember anything from the time he reached the bottom of the ramp and the time the police jumped him, and it's because nothing happened between those two things. But, they were probably afraid that she was on the road to figuring it out and eventually would, and that was plenty enough reason to kill her. Please read my latest, Mark. All Ruby's lawyers had to do was study the images of the shooter closely, and they would have seen that he wasn't their client. But, they didn't, and the reason why is because they had the disease of "Americana" which is the thought that nothing that monstrous could happen here because this is America, and such things don't happen here. They do, and they did, Mark.  Ralph 

http://oswaldinthedoorway.blogspot.com/2019/09/so-lets-consider-that-there-are-two.html