Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Duncan is not a good thinker at all. The point of this collage is that Oswald's shirt tended to bulge at the margin. 

It tended to bulge, but it didn't bulge in the same place all the time. It varied. It was higher at one time and lower at another time. There really wasn't a defined crease there, so the fold was rather lumpy. That is the point, and you can see it on both of them. 

But look how much more we can see. We can see the same triangular sprawl to the opening and the exposure of the t-shirt. We see the exact same formation of the right collar. 

Could it possibly match any better than that? 

We see the same triangular shape of the t-shirt opening.

And we can even see the lapel on the left side (our right) because it's obvious the material is twice as thick on that side compared to the other side. It's twice as thick because it's doubled over into a lapel, just as we see on Oswald on the left. 

If Duncan isn't impressed with the likeness here, then let him put up a comparison to Lovelady (whichever Lovelady he wants to use) and show that it matches so much better. But, he hasn't done that, and nobody has done it. And that's because it can't be done. 

Yes, Duncan, shirts don't hang and lay exactly the same all the time. They are movable, and they're moving all the time as the individual moves. I shouldn't have to point that out to an adult person. But, as I've been saying all along, you are a very adolescent person, hence, your art, your music, and everything else you do. Grow up!