Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

This is an interesting interview of John McAfee, the internet pioneer, by Alex Jones. And right about the 2 minute mark, John makes an interesting comment. He says that if you know the NSA is spying on us, then you have to assume that the other covert branches of government must also be doing it. After all, why not?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3o-Flb5CBOo 

And it got me thinking in relation to a discussion we're having on the OIC Facebook page. Staffan brought up the issue of Zapruder film alteration, which is the one piece of JFK imagery for which there is widespread recognition of alteration. 

I don't know what percent of CTs think the Z-film was altered. Obviously, no LNs do. But, many CTs do. I don't know what the percentage is, but it may be as high as 50% or more. That's a lot. 

But, to all those who think that it's altered, who can see that it's altered (such as frames removed to hide the extreme slowing and/or stopping of the limo during the shooting) why, in the spirit of what John McAfee said, would you think they would limit it to just one film or image? Nearly all of the motorcade films and photos wound up in government hands, either directly or indirectly (such as Life magazine buying the Martin film from Jack Martin and then "lending" it to the FBI for 6 months). It's true of the Wiegman film, the Hughes film, the Darnell film, etc. It's like after 9/11 when they went around confiscating films, including security films from gas stations and whatnot. 

My point is that IF you admit to Z-film alteration, as many if not most CTs do, then you CAN'T close your mind to Altgens photo alteration. It makes no sense.