Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Lance Uppercut: "I have demonstrated that the shirt is an exact match to Lovelady's plaid."

The magnitude of the falsehood of the above statement is staggering to behold.

First, Lovelady didn't wear plaid. He wore striped. Every single image of Lovelady wearing plaid on 11/22/63 is fake. And when we put them side by side, we see that they were different men, and not one of them was Lovelady.

As you can readily see, these are three different men. Their hair is different. Their faces are different. Their builds are different. One has his shirt propped open in a weird (impossible) rectangular sprawl while the other two aren't sprawled at all. One has a big pocket-flap, the other two don't have one. All three ears are different. All three men are different. Vividly.  

And it so happens that none of them are Lovelady.

So now we have 4 different men, and only one of them (the one above) was Lovelady. And notice what kind of shirt he is wearing: a striped one. Lovelady told the FBI that that was the shirt he wore on 11/22/63. We have that in writing twice: once in a FBI letter to the Warren Commission signed by two FBI agents, and once in an internal FBI memo: "He stated he was wearing and red and white striped shirt and blue jeans." 

And just think about it: why would they photograph him with his shirt unbuttoned like Doorman unless it was the same shirt? What would be the point?

Do you think it was Lovelady's idea to pose like that? For a photograph? Of course not. He wasn't calling the shots. He wasn't telling the FBI what to do. Lovelady was following orders, not giving them. 

The FBI was obviously trying to duplicate the look of Doorman. It was their idea that he pose like that, and what I'm saying is that they, the FBI, told him, in advance, to wear the same clothes he wore on 11/22. When the appointment was set up, they must have told him to wear those clothes. Because otherwise, it was just a coincidence that he happened to show up wearing those clothes on 2/29/64, and you know where I think JFK coincidences can be shoved- the same place Joseph Backes shoves his proscenium arches. 

So Lance, you being the dungeon master that you are ....

you know where you can go and what you can do when you get there. And while you're at it, you might as well play that awful raucous music that you make because it fits right in with what you're doing. Besides, it might drown out the screams. 

But, is Doorman's shirt even a match to un-Lovelady's plaid?

Lance goes in for naked sports, but I go in for naked analysis when it comes to images. That is, when we're comparing images, I say we use naked images and not ones with lines and markings drawn over key areas being examined. 

On unLovelady's plaid, we see fine white lines that are both vertical and horizontal. On Doorman we see no such lines. The white marks that we see are too thick, too substantial, and too crude to correspond to the fine, delicate, precise lines on unLovelady's shirt. 

The area of Doorman's shirt that is the cleanest, that is, the most free of haze and distortion, is his upper right quadrant (on our left). Using that and comparing it to unLovelady's shirt, we see no correlation whatsoever. 

There is nothing there. We are left with a complete zero with no correlation whatsoever between the two. So, not only does Doorman's shirt not match Lovelady's, it doesn't even match unLovelady's.

Doorman's shirt was a match to Oswald's. We can see that clearly.

 Oswald's shirt pattern was grainy, and that is what we see on Doorman: the same pattern, the same fit, the same lay, the same open sprawl, the same right collar, the same left lapel, the same everything. Same shirt, same t-shirt, same man.