He berates me for using a photo of Lovelady to compare the shirts which he knows I don't even think was Lovelady. But, that doesn't matter. The fact is that others use that photo as Billy Lovelady just 30 minutes after the Doorman scene and close to the same spot. It is the most widely used, most widely circulated image of Billy Lovelady from 11/22/63, and nothing even comes close.
The photo has to be from 11/22/63 because the clothes are an issue. We are not just matching the man but the clothes. So, the only way to be sure it's the same clothes is to restrict it to that day. What other photo of Lovelady from 11/22/63 would bpete prefer that I use?
He suggests this idiotic image from the so-called Hughes film.
Is it necessary for me to point out that that guy doesn't even look photographic? And since it's supposed to be the same guy in the same place at the exact same moment in time, how do you reconcile this?
Are you sure it was a good idea for you to bring that other one up, bpete?
And finally, bpete thinks that if you look at the sleeves, you do see matching patterns there:
bpete tried to sneak in the old Groden scan, which is his favorite because with all the haze, it has more contrast. But even Robin Unger admits that this image above is the best one we have of Doorman. And you clearly do not see the plaid pattern with the crossing horizontal and vertical lines and boxes as you do on Lovelady. Not on the sleeve and not anywhere else.
You can't sell it, bpete. Nobody is buying it. So quit trying.
Now, as to the other possible identity for bpete: it's Duncan MacRae, the guy who runs the JFK assassination forum. I've been considering him for a while without mentioning it. It started in my mind when bpete posted a clip of Jack Nicholson pretending he was masturbating in Cuckoo's Nest. That's a favorite of Duncan MacRae.
I stress that I don't know this for a fact. I'm saying he is a contender. And I'm allowed to speculate about it since bpete chooses to use an alias. He feels the need to use an alias to discuss a point of history, and I have to right to explore the possibilities of whom he might be.
Of course, that is not the only reason why I consider DM a top tier candidate along with Steve Haydon and Albert Doyle. MacRae is in the UK (Scotland) which is where bpete is. MacRae has the same position on the assassination; he is what I call an HSCA CT.
Friends, please listen to me because this is important: Any time you come across a HSCA CT, run for the hills and while you're running, think "Op." This position is so unreasonable that only an Op could have it. It is that everything the WC said is right, where Oswald was the shooter and the lone killer, but there was another shooter on the Grassy Knoll who shot and missed- and apparently got clean away like a fart in a high wind.
That is a ridiculous position. It was ridiculous in 1979 when it was first announced. How many law enforcement officers- state, federal, or local- ever went looking for Oswald's accomplice? It's a nice round number: 0. Nobody took it seriously, and for good reason.
If Oswald had had an accomplice- some buddy who, like him, had it in for Kennedy (not really because Oswald liked Kennedy)- how long would it have taken law enforcement to find him? How long did it take them to find Terry Nichols after they caught Timothy McVeigh? Let's put it this way: it would be a stretch to say that it would have taken them 50 hours never mind 50 years.
But, the other contention is that both Oswald and the Grassy Knoll shooter were part of a larger conspiracy that that involved the Mafia or the CIA or both.
The problem is that no group in its right collective mind would have assigned Lee Harvey Oswald to such a task. Oswald was not an assassin. He had never shot at another human being in his life. (And if you are going to bring up the so-called Walker shooting, I tell you to shove it where Joseph Backes shoves his proscenium arches.)
Oswald barely passed his last Marine proficiency exam, and he did very little shooting after that. He never in his whole freaking life shot at a target perched in a window with a defective rifle at a moving target that was moving down a sloped, curving, bumpy road, and with an obstructed visual field. This would have been the very first time for him. Why would anyone in his right mind think that LHO was the right man for the job? No one would.
One of our senior members, Craig Roberts, a former military sniper and police SWAT officer, visited the 6th floor museum. He wanted to get up to the sniper's nest and glance out, but they have it glassed off. But, he was able to go up to a nearby window and glance out, and he instantly knew that Oswald didn't do it. He knew that Oswald didn't do it because he knew that he could not have done it, and he knew very well that he was a better, a more capable marksman and sniper than Lee Harvey Oswald.
It's risky when you put a guy in a window and have him start shooting at people in a car. There's this thing that can happen where he misses the target and hits someone else. He easily could have hit Jackie by mistake, and that would have been a catastrophe for the conspirators. That whole thing about LBJ taking the oath of office with Jackie by his side was something he planned in advance and insisted on. It's what gave legitimacy to the transfer of power. She was like the physical manifestation of the deceased JFK, smiling down from Heaven, giving his blessing to the whole thing.
If Jackie had been shot or killed, LBJ would have taken his oath of office standing on the bloody bodies of both Jack and Jackie, and it would not have gone so well, believe me. They weren't going to take a chance with an inexperienced, make that non-experienced, shooter. The plain truth is that Oswald had never done anything like this in his life.
Bottom Line: if there was a conspiracy, they were going to get the very best and most experienced assassins they could, in a word: professionals. Oswald was not a professional assassin. He wasn't any kind of assassin. There is no way that "they" would have put Oswald in that window with a rifle in his hands. He was a patsy and nothing more.
So, this position of Duncan MacRae is ridiculous. It is patently absurd. And it is a screaming reason to suspect "Op".
Why? It's because Ops like to be CTs, to pose as CTs. They have nothing to prove to LNs. Their only mountain to climb is with CTs. So, you start off by being a CT. Makes you seem simpatico, get it? But, they want to just barely nudge the boundary of CTery- just so that they can get the label. So, this HSCA CT stop is perfect for them, and it's where they like to go.
Duncan MacRae runs that JFK Assassination forum, and it' s a big forum with huge bandwidth. And he's not doing it on blogger or other free platform; he is paying for it. And supposedly, he is paying for it all by himself. How's he doing it? And he's there most of the time participating, plus he's also participating on other forums. He spends a heck of a lot of time JFKing. So, when is he out punching a time-clock to earn the money at an actual job to pay for it all?
There are a lot of JFK Ops out there and most of them pretend to be CTs. Of that I am absolutely certain. And I also think that it's common to have Ops outside the USA, and the UK is a preferred choice since it's English-speaking and allied with the US. I have some prior experience with this.
There is a guy named Mike Williams who runs a propaganda site concerning 9/11. Of course, he defends the official story. He claims that he is an "author and software developer" but try to find a book by Michael Williams from the UK, and try to find some software developed by Michael Williams from the UK. If he was successful enough with his book and his software to be able to retire to 9/11 blogging, they must be pretty successful. So, why can't we find the evidence.
I have long been involved in the 9/11 truth movement. I support it to this day. I like Architects and Engineers for 9/11 truth; they are my favorite group.
I had a run-in online with Mike Williams some years ago, and I saved all of our correspondence and still have it. I won't go into it, but I became utterly convinced that he was an Op. And I had someone check out the company that was hosting his elaborate site, and it was a hosting company in Arizona that does 90% of its business with the US military. Now, why would a bloke from the UK have chosen that company to host his site? I don't know if he is still hosted with them, but he was then.
These guys are Ops, and quite a few are in the UK. Steve Haydon, bpete, Patrick Collins, Duncan MacRae- all known to be in the UK. And Duncan MacRae now joins the list as a serious contender for being bpete. Here is Duncan MacRae. Note that bpete goes by bpete1969, and if that's a birth date, he's 44.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.