Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

bpete finally got his jollies posting the picture of me with my former wife, Margaret. I knew he was excited about doing it, that he considered it a very strong card he was holding. But, why did he wait so long? He must have felt really rattled. But now that he's posted it, now what? I don't have any other ex-wives. 

He is a very busy guy, this bpete. Besides JFK, he's very active in the 9-11 debate- on both sides of it. Here he is on Pilots for 9/11 Truth interacting with founder Rob Balsamo.

bpete is a member over there, even though he is anything but a 9/11 truther. He's very active on 9/11 "debunking" sites, such as Screw Loose Change. 

I have just written to Rob Balsamo, the head of Pilots for 9/11 Truth telling him that bpete is a spy in his midst, and I sent him links to bpete's activity on "9/11 debunking" sites. I'm sure Rob is aware that dis-informationists join his group, and now he knows that bpete is one of them.  

bpete1969 is nothing but a professional, full-time internet blogger and dis-informationist. I don't know who is paying him, but I am certain that somebody is. This is his job, his profession.

bpete is a paid internet shill. I'll say it again:

bpete is a paid internet shill.

Just like this guy:

http://consciouslifenews.com/paid-internet-shill-shadowy-groups-manipulate-internet-opinion-debate/

Now, you listen up, bpete: I want you to put in writing that you are NOT a paid internet shill because when you do, I am going to copy and save, and then at the appropriate time, I'll use it. So go ahead and deny it; do it now. 

But getting back to JFK, there is a very important point about "out with Bill Shelley in front" that bpete is missing, and that is: 
it doesn't matter that Oswald did not use the word "doorway" when describing where he was with Shelley. Shelley WAS in the doorway, which he and others admitted. And if Oswald went outside, there is no chance that he went beyond the doorway. He wasn't out on Elm. He wasn't wandering around Dealey Plaza. He had to beat Marrion Baker to the lunch room, and Baker reached the steps 10 seconds after the last shot. And he, unlike Oswald, was moving fast- running. Oswald had to walk to the lunch room and not at a fast pace because Baker reported that he was calm, unflustered, not out of breath. 

This issue has been discussed in relation to Oswald not having run down from the 6th floor. How could Oswald have finished with the rifle, wiped his prints off it, hid it on the opposite side of the 6th floor, and having to climb over a stack of boxes to do it, and then race down the stairs to the 2nd floor lunch room without being the least bit winded? 

But, it works the same way for him going up from the doorway. Oswald had to leave that doorway early- before Baker arrived there- in order to get to the lunch room before Baker without huffing and puffing from exertion. 

These two Doormen from the Wiegman film are not the same guy.

Notice how different the shirt sprawls are. On the left, it's v-shaped, but on the right, it's r-shaped. It's supposed to be the same guy standing in the same spot separated by 3 seconds of time. Notice the round head on the right and the more rectangular head on the left. Notice the greater degree of baldness on the man on the right. Notice the thick chest on the right and the slender frame on the left. The Doorman on the left is facing Kennedy as expected, but the Doorman on the right is turned and facing straight out the doorway- an inexplicable change under the circumstances. Joseph Backes said he had begun the mourning process for Kennedy. That's a good one.  

They are not the same man. The man on the left is Lee Harvey Oswald. The man on the right is somebody else, somebody they put into the film after Oswald left so that there would be a Doorman there. 

The point is that Oswald left, and left early, and that had to be true because he beat Truly and Baker to the lunch room, and they were moving fast, and he wasn't. 

The point is that Shelley was definitely in the doorway, and there is nowhere else outside that Oswald could have been except the doorway, therefore, the doorway was implied in "out with Bill Shelley in front." Oswald didn't have to say it. It's automatic. 

No, I didn't make anything up, but if you had more than loose screws in your brain, you would realize that for Oswald "in front" and "in the doorway" were a tautology.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tautology_(logic)

There is simply no place else outside he could have been but that doorway. So, if he was "out with Bill Shelley in front" he was, by necessity, in the doorway. There is no placing him any farther out into Dealey Plaza and for multiple reasons. 

Finally, bpete says this:

The FBI said that fibers from Oswald's arrest shirt were found on the rifle, so it meant that Oswald was wearing the arrest shirt when he used the rifle. They found the fibers on the butt of the rifle, the idea being that he had the butt of the rifle butted against his shoulder, which is to say the shirt, and some of the fibers came off.

Amazingly, bpete is trying to have his cake and eat it too. He's trying to maintain that a shirt-change took place and yet justify why fibers from Oswald's arrest shirt (the second shirt) would be on the gun. This is so idiotic, it feels wacky to even talk about it. 

If Oswald changed out of the shirt he wore when he used the rifle, then there is no reason why fibers from the shirt he changed out of should be on the rifle. 

Is bpete completely nuts? 

But, keep it up, bpete because we're just getting started, and you don't know what's coming. Come on, mo-fo. Bring it on.