Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Another thing to consider is that even if bpete's argument is true  (and it is not true) it still would not account for the vee we see on Doorman. 

You see, the disparity to Lovelady would still exist. Lovelady's t-shirt was not v-shaped. And bpete seems to be willing to concede that nobody was wearing store-bought v-neck t-shirts back then, certainly none of our boys. In every picture we have of Lovelady- from 1963 until 1976 when he repeatedly posed as Doorman, he always wore a crewneck t-shirt. There is simply no basis whatsoever to say that Billy Lovelady wore a v-neck t-shirt on 11/22/63. In fact, it would be quite absurd to say so. 

So, if you are going to to argue that Doorman was Lovelady, how come their t-shirts don't match? But wait! Say it isn't so! Don't tell me you are going to merge the "tear" claim with the "shadow" claim and use both.  

I thought we were done with the shadow claim. I have already announced its demise. 

Besides, if you're going to use the shadow claim, why do you even need the tear claim? If Doorman's vee is the result of Lovelady's round t-shirt being overlain with neck shadow making it look vee, then what difference does it make what happened to Oswald? It seems to me that it's a wasted effort. 

Anyway, you think about it, bpete, and try to explain the divergence between Doorman and the guy whom you think he is. Oswald's fight at the theater can't help you.