Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Two people, Randy and Lee, have asked me to make a concise statement about the case for Oswald in the doorway. Here it is, as posted on Randy Gunter's Facebook page:

Randy has asked me to make a concise statement on the case for Oswald in the doorway. I'd like to start by encouraging people to visit our website at www.oswald-innocent.com. It's only 7 pages long, and most of it is pictures, so you can go through it fast. 

After the assassination, people from all over the world thought they saw Oswald in the doorway, but authorities quickly announced that it was another employee, Billy Lovelady. You'd think that they would have released pictures right away so that people could see with their own eyes that it was him, Lovelady. But, they didn't. They waited 3 months and then took pictures of Lovelady. Did they publish them? No. Instead, they quietly sent them to Warren Commission which tucked them into the back of the Warren Report, in the Appendix, as an attachment to a letter, without comment, analysis, acknowledgement, or review. There is no evidence they even looked at them. Meanwhile, professional photographers were sent to Dallas to try to capture a picture of Lovelady, and they were harassed and threatened by the Dallas Police, the FBI, and the Secret Service. It was very fortunate that a photographer commissioned by Mark Lane did get pictures of Lovelady, showing that he was much balder than the FBI images suggested. 

                        

When the Warren Report came out in Sept '64, Harold Weisberg started making a stink. He had the letter from the FBI saying that Lovelady stated that he had worn a red and white striped shirt, which just happened to be the one in which he was photographed by the FBI- with the buttons undone like Doorman. And just recently, we discovered an internal FBI memo which said the same thing: that Lovelady said he wore the striped shirt on 11/22/63. And it was only after that that the movies started popping up of Lovelady wearing the plaid shirt. There was no mention of those movies by the Warren Commission. And Ball asked Lovelady specifically if he saw Oswald again after they broke for lunch. 

Ball: Did you EVER see Oswald again THAT DAY (after breaking for lunch)? 
Lovelady: No.

That is powerful stuff. He wouldn't have forgotten a thing like that. Bill Shelley was asked the exact same question, and he piped up right away that he saw Oswald at the police station. 

As for Doorman, he is wearing Oswald's shirt. That unbuttoned, sprawled open arrangement was his and his alone. There is no chance that Lovelady was configured that way. Even when he posed, his shirt and his shirt-sprawl did not compare to Doorman's. 

That is not the same thing, and Lovelady's doesn't even look natural. Do you really think he primped himself that way on 11/22/63 to go to work laying flooring? He looks like he's all duded-up to go to the square dance. 

When we look at Lovelady, supposedly just minutes later in front of the building, his shirt is not sprawled open at all. 

That guy cannot possibly be Doorman. In actual fact, he can't possibly be Lovelady either. Lovelady reported that he and Shelley left the front immediately- before Baker even reached the steps- and they were never to return. They re-entered thru the back door. So, Lovelady was not milling around out front when the police checkpoint was set up, as seen in the clip from Martin. Plus, the guy looks nothing like Lovelady.





You don't have to be a doctor to know that those are two different men. 

So, the outer shirt was Oswald's. The notched t-shirt was Oswald's. The slender build was Oswald's. The right ear was Oswald's. The square chin was Oswald's. The one and only thing that matches Lovelady is the hairline, and that was faked. It's a match to Lovelady but when he was much younger- still a boy really. He could not have been more than 20 years old at the time, so that would make it 1957. 

So, since the hairline does not match that of 1963 Lovelady, it means that nothing- absolutely nothing matches 1963 Lovelady. 

Folks, it's Oswald in the doorway, and with him even saying that he was "out with Bill Shelley in front" there is not a scintilla of doubt. How could he know Shelley was out there unless he saw him? Even if you assume that he assumed that Shelley was outside just because most employees were, how could he know that Shelley was specifically confined to that doorway? He must have seen him there. He must have been there. It's time to stop the lies. Oswald was outside.