Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Mike

7:45 PM (2 hours ago)

- show quoted text -

You are wrong on BOTH COUNTS.

1) I do not blame everything on Jewish people. That is your attempt to
slur me because I do believe that Israel had the greatest motive to have
JFK assassinated because JFK would not allow Israel to possess nuclear
weapons. The fact that Jack Ruby, the man who killed Oswald, was Jewish is
consistent with that motive, but by no means conclusive. But I realize
that this makes it easy for those who want to play the "anti-semetic" card
to do so. But when someone does that it really tells me how that person is
thinking and not how I think.


2) Your photographic interpretation skills are atrocious. Your skill in
photographic interpretation is at the level of a grade school child. I did
not criticize you before because I have very little interest in the
"doorway" man nonsense. I do not debate you because it would be like
debating a child and you are not even able to understand how silly some of
the things you say are.

3)If you keep up with this Moorman nonsense you are going to make complete
fools out of those people in your "OIC" group. 

Ralph Cinque

1) You are indeed fixated with Jewish involvement in the case, to the point of asking whether so-and-so was Jewish, as though if he was, he must have been working for Israel because, of course, every Jew is. You're obsessed. 

2) Your photographic interpretation skills are non-existent. And let's get something crystal here: the only attack that matters is a specific one. General denunciation of my photographic skills, without detailing what you mean, means nothing. You're just flapping your lips. If some of the things I say are silly, what things are you talking about and what makes them silly? You've got to be specific.  

In other words, speaking metaphorically, if you want to fight, you have to get into the ring. You haven't done that. Oswald was definitely in the doorway, and we know that because we can see him there, with excellent correlation of his face and build, but also a perfect match of his clothing to that of Doorway Man. 

Now, if you want to provide the basis for saying that those two are not the same man and that it's "silly" to think that they are, go ahead. I'm waiting. But, you better have an image of Lovelady that matches better because this is very much a default situation. It has to be one or the other. And, it's a matter of who matches Doorman better. Neither one matches perfectly, but who matches better? That's the question, and that is how you have to look at it. 

3) The Moorman photo was definitely not taken by Mary Moorman. It's impossible for her to have taken it and for many reasons, a cardinal one being that she has always claimed that she heard other shots after taking her picture. Yet, it's a known fact that the Moorman photo was taken after the last shot, the final shot. But, even if we didn't know that, we know that the Moorman photo is an eccentric photo taken not squarely but at an angle to the subject (the Kennedys) whereas Mary Moorman was facing them squarely. The photographer who took that picture was facing them diagonally. See the arrow in this picture? That was the photographer. She is the only one who had the right perspective to take it. 

Oh, and by the way, I'm making you famous.