Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Now Hondo is calling me a shill.

I'll tell you something, James Norwood: you are aligning yourself with someone who places Oswald on the 6th floor "locking and loading" on Kennedy. Those are his words. 

And what Hondo does at times is pretend to be a CT. And it's because he knows he's got nothing to prove with lonenutters. He's preaching to the choir to them. He wants to win points with the people who might listen to me, that is, conspiracy advocates. So, at times, and quite often, he pretends to be one. 

He even put up on Facebook, "Oswald MAY have been innocent, but he wasn't outside."  

MAY? MAY? Would a real conspiracy advocate use a word like that? Hondo has praised Vincent Bugliosi. Would a real conspiracy advocate do that?

Hondo is a paid shill. He was career-military with training in intelligence gathering: 

bpete: I am an Army veteran. I served my country honorably. I have a pretty damned good grasp of battlefield tactics and strategy and the prerequisites of intelligence gathering and analysis.

His post-military career is doing this. And it involves committing crimes. Bpete is a JFK reseacher who resorts to crime. 

So, that's who you are involved with, James. And if you don't believe me, try telling him this:

"Bpete, I support you in fighting Ralph Cinque, but I do not want to be associated with someone who does not support Oswald innocence, and who does not reject the official story of the JFK assassination. So, before I can comment again on your site, I need a statement from you stipulating that although you reject Oswald in the doorway, you do recognize Oswald's innocence."

Go ahead. Try it. Or does it not matter to you? Perhaps you are perfectly willing to associate with lonenutters. If so, then you have truly gone to Hell. It makes you a disgrace- to your profession and to the cause of JFK truth. 

But in response to Hondo's latest: you're full of shit, Hondo.

THIS is the frame that corresponds to the Moorman photo.

And notice that in neither one do you see Clint Hill.

Mary was facing Elm Street squarely in this frame, meaning that her line of sight, and her camera's line of sight was 90 degrees to Elm Street. And JFK and Jackie were right across from her, right in front of her, which means they would have been in the center of any picture she took. It couldn't possibly come out like this:

 Hondo, the only thing you are proving is that you are just as stupid as Joseph Backes, and that's pathetic. You're a fucking moron.