Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

You can't defend Oswald without giving him an alibi. If you're not going to do it, you are just making hot air and noise, and you might as well STFU for the little good you're doing. 

Why do you think nothing good happened for Oswald in half a century? It's because people weren't focusing on the most important thing: his alibi.

When a criminal defendant gets acquitted, why do you think it is? 95% of the time, it's because he had an effective alibi. 

And what do you think happens to defendants who don't have an effective alibi? They usually get convicted. 

Look, this is very simple: Either Oswald was up on the 6th floor shooting at Kennedy or he wasn't. And if he wasn't, then he HAD to be somewhere else. And the number of places that he could have been is very small. 

This is a very explorable, definable, discernible situation, and it goes to the very core of Oswald's defense. 

So, do you care about defending Oswald or not? Are you into this to exonerate Oswald or are you doing it for some other reasons? If you're doing it to defend Oswald, then you need to drop everything else you thought was important and hone in on the one thing that can actually help him: his alibi; where he was and what he was doing when the crime occurred. 

And, if you can't see the importance of that, then STOP calling yourself an Oswald defender because you are not one. You are just a critic, a detractor of the official story; that's all you are. You're not acting like Oswald's defense attorney. And if you don't want to act like his defense attorney, then you are useless- to him and to me. 

Oswald had an alibi. It was that he was in the doorway watching the motorcade when the murder of President Kennedy took place. I guarantee you that if he were here, he'd be saying it himself. But, since he's not here, the OIC is saying it for him.