And that's it. So, why did authorities have to keep getting Mary's photo from her, again and again and again? What were they looking at? Obviously, something concerned them. Something bothered them. But what?
And no matter what it was, what did they need hers back for? Undoubtedly, they had larger ones and better ones. Enhanced ones.
You can't tell me they expected to get information from hers that they couldn't get from the copies they had.
It can only mean one thing: something was showing that they didn't want seen. And so, according to Mary, the CIA came and got; the FBI came and got it; the Secret Service came and got it; and then the FBI came again, and when they returned it, it had the thumbprint.
Are you an Oswald defender? A real Oswald defender? Then this ought to look awfully bad to you. And there is no good reason to start looking for sunny, rosy, innocent explanations for it.
The national security state killed Kennedy. It was a coup d'etat. Oswald was nothing but a framed and innocent patsy. Wantonly, they killed Kennedy. They also killed Tippit. That was to frame Oswald for his murder in the hope the Dallas cops would be trigger-happy when they caught him. Then, two days later, on national television, the same people (through perhaps a long list of intermediaries) killed Oswald. And you know that many more died after that in a coverup which has gone on non-stop for 52 years and counting. You know all of that if you know that Oswald was innocent. So, why would you have truthful accepting that they would modify images to remove truthful elements as needed? Again, are you really an Oswald defender? And if you are, why would you collaborate in any way with those whom you know are not Oswald defenders?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.