Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I can always count on you to get it wrong, Clark Rob. Page 1 of the Fritz Notes show that when first asked, Oswald said he only changed his "britches" which means pants. I don't know if he used that word or not, but it's the word Fritz wrote down.

"home by bus changed britches" You see that? It says nothing about changing his shirt.

Now, why Oswald mentioned changing his shirt the next time, assuming that he did since Fritz wrote it down, I do not know. But, I think it's far more likely he told the truth the first time, and others agree.

And by the way, no soiled red, long-sleeved shirt was found among his dirty clothes. However, they did find grey pants- the ones he changed out of.

Had Oswald been wearing a red, long-sleeved shirt at work, why wasn't it on him when Baker encountered him? Baker described his clothes as a "light brown jacket" (and he explained afterwards that to him it looked like a jacket even though he knows that others consider it a shirt) "with a white shirt underneath". No red shirt, no red shirt, no red shirt. And don't tell me that he had taken it off because there are no grounds for that.

Here is Oswald being arrested wearing the exact same clothes that Officer Baker described: from the lunch room a light-weight, light brown jacket and a a white shirt, which was a t-shirt.

Oswald didn't change his clothes. You're wrong again, Rob. Go draw some more sleazy pictures. It's the only thing you're good at.