Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

I don't know where bpete got this particular copy of CE 369, but it is a beauty! I want you to notice that you can see every bit of Frazier's arrow, including the head of it! Look at that thing! It's black-on-black, yet it's completely visible, plain as day. You can see the whole damn thing. You can see exactly how Frazier drew it. Not a bit of it is missing. Not even a speck, Mr. 19.

And since that's the case, isn't it reasonable to assume that if Lovelady had drawn another arrow pointing to Doorman, say coming down diagonally on the other side, that we'd see it? Why not?

No one has any right to assume that Lovelady's arrow is there only we can't see it because it's invisible. Not any more. That's because Frazier's arrow is completely visible.

And notice that this cropping of bpete's CE 369 not only includes Frazier's arrow in full view, it also includes the entire area in which an alternate arrow for Lovelady might be found. So, you can study Frazier's arrow and then look for a comparable one for Lovelady. But, if you can't find another arrow for Lovelady, then the little one I found on Black Hole Man wins by default.

And by the way, this particular showing of the Altgens photo isn't serving your plaidification needs at all, Mr. 19.

Let's see you do your overlapping with this version of Doorman's shirt. I'm sure it's closer to the real thing than the distorted version of Groden. I keep telling you that what his version shows is really just haze and distortion. 

If haze and distortion were an advanced sexual bondage technique, then you'd get it.