Thursday, October 3, 2013

No, Backes. There is only one sane thing to do, and that is to look at the boy and the baby and decide, based on their appearance, whether they are the same person. All of the other criteria you mentioned are completely irrelevant, and your failure to realize that proves that you have a fundamental incapacity to think.


How can they be the same when the boy is obviously so much larger and older? How could they be the same when the Altgens woman is in white and the Towner woman is in black? How can they be the same when the boy's hat rises to a point or peak, while the baby's hat has no such peak? How can they be the same when the boy is looking towards Elm while the baby is turned the other way nestled over its mother's shoulder?  How can they be the same when the Towner woman's hair is flowing down her shoulders while the Altgens woman's is not?

They are obviously a different mother and a different child, and you are just being insane to say otherwise when it's obvious to plain sight that they are different.

You are out of your mind, Backes. The disparities exist, and no rationalizations of yours can make them go away.


No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.