Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Backes, it's a simple question: how is the woman holding up the baby? We know that she has her left arm high in the air waving at the President. So, that leaves her right arm, except that we can't see it anywhere doing anything.

This is freaky. You've got this woman with a big head, where the head is huge in proportion to the body. She has a face, but no facial features. We can't make out a thing- not even her eyes. Not even her eye sockets are showing. And she has no neck. Where is the tapering of her neck? Then we see a strange halo which is presumably her flicking left hand waving atop her head, but for some reason we can't see her left arm going up. It's like her hand is a separate thing, detached from her body. 

And where are the baby's arms? Shouldn't we at least see the baby's right arm? Where is it? Is it extended forward and hanging over the mother's shoulder? Is it hanging down? But, if it's hanging down, shouldn't we see it? Why does the baby look like nothing but two blobs: an orange one for its wool hat, and a white one for its coat, but without any part of her being distinguishable or recognizable?

And what is holding the baby up? There are so many freaky things about this picture, why is anyone OK with it? And this is supposedly the "good" version.  Here is how it appears in the Towner movie:

What the hell is wrong with the JFK research community when we have researchers looking at this shit and saying, "No problem here"? 

They're not real, Backes. The Towner Woman and Baby are not real. They're not even close to being real. They're not even reasonably well faked. They are terribly badly faked. And you want to accept this shit? Woe is the world that the likes of you passes for a JFK researcher.