Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

No, Backes. I'm not saying that Harold Weisberg would approve of my advocacy of Oswald in the doorway if he were here. I'm saying that he advocated it himself long before I was ever involved or gave it any thought. It's not that he would have followed me; it's that I, in fact, followed him.

There is a thread right now on McAdams' forum about Zapruder film manipulation. But, "manipulation" is just another word for "alteration".

Yes, the Zapruder film was altered, and lots of people in the JFK community say so, both big names and small. Frames were removed in order to hide the severe slowing- or outright stopping- of the vehicle during the shooting. And that's just the most obvious thing that they did. 

But, to every one of the people who recognize Zapruder film alteration, I implore them to recognize that if it's true, then surely the other JFK assassination films were also altered to bolster the conspirators' lies.     

Here is an interesting paragraph by Brad on McAdam's forum in which he points out that very few images were made public immediately after the assassination:

What is lost on a lot of people born after the JFK ambush is that there 
were very few visuals released in a timely manner following the attack. 
For about a week all that was printed in newspapers were Altgens6 & 
Altgens7 along with Moorman5. A few Zapruder frames were printed in black 
& white & the photo with what was believed to be JFK's foot hanging over 
the side. That was about it for awhile. More photos became available via 
Life magazine in Nov 1966 & the 'Why JFK Went to Texas' Life issue in 1967 
than were ever released the weekend of & subsequent weeks after the 
attack. Josiah Thompson had some additional photos in his book 'Six 
Seconds In Dallas' that were new to the public in 1967. Most everything 
else came from the Warren Commission volumes. 

The Zapruder film wasn't made public until 1975- over a decade after the assassination. But what about the other films? What chance did regular people have to see them? The widespread availability of these JFK films had to wait until the arrival of the Internet. That's what has made them accessible. 

And it really has been a disaster for them. And by "them" I mean the people who killed Kennedy. And I don't mean the men who pulled the triggers, but rather the men who organized it, who arranged it, who conceived of it and put the whole vile plan into motion. 

Consider that only two physical elements have ever been used to tie Doorman to Lovelady: the hairline and the shirt pattern. 

I have acknowledged the match of the hairline, but it's to the wrong Lovelady. It's to Lovelady when he was practically still a boy. It looks like it might have been his high school prom picture.

That image of Young Lovelady was published by the HSCA in 1979, however they flipped it.

Do you realize how many flipped images there are in the JFK assassination? A lot! And it was no accident. In political propaganda, they often use the flipped image- if they think it serves them better. Why did they flip this one? Perhaps at the time they wanted to hide the hairline match. 

The existence of the image of Young Lovelady was never acknowledged by the FBI or the Warren Commission, although I'm sure they had it. The HSCA dated it as 1959, but judging by his age, I think it was earlier. He doesn't look more than 20 to me in the picture, which would make it 1957. 

But regardless, Billy Lovelady was a rapidly balding young man, and there is no way that his hairline remained stable during that time. We know from Mark Lane's photo taken shortly after the assassination, that Lovelady was already quite bald. 

So, don't tell me that Doorman's hairline matched Lovelady's. It didn't. It matched Lovelady from an earlier time. 

So, what does that leave as a matching feature to Lovelady? The only other thing claimed is the shirt pattern, but it's bogus. There is no match. 

Those shirt patterns do not come close to matching. On Doorman, there is no rectangular, geometric pattern. The vague contrast on Doorman doesn't come close to what we see on Lovelady. In fact, it doesn't look like any shirt pattern at all. Rather, it's just vague contrast, the result of haze, distortion, and light reflection. Making it out to be the plaid pattern on the right is terribly wrong, wickedly wrong. And of course, the open sprawl on Doorman is completely missing on the Lovelady figure, and that counts as a disqualifier too. 

So, what does that leave as a match to Lovelady? NOTHING! Absolutely nothing. In the end, there is no case to be made for Lovelady. None. Once you eliminate the bogus stuff, you are left with zilch. The only genuine match is to Oswald. 

People from all over the world saw the match to Oswald. Authorities quickly said it was Lovelady, but Lovelady doesn't work; he doesn't hold up. And that flips it back to Oswald. There is nothing left to support the Lovelady claim except lies; bold, blatant, barreling, blustering lies.