Oswald in the doorway: the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, by Ralph Cinque

Joseph Backes is mentally ill. That he would sink to his latest level of depravity and want such a thing on his own website is staggering. I am certainly not going to post it here, but I think it's important that you know who I am up against. So, I'll give you the link, but I have to warn you: it is shocking and disgusting. 

http://www.ralphcinqueisastupidbitch.blogspot.com/

Joseph Backes is a vile, crude, and disturbed individual. He is also incapable of grasping the photographic evidence. And that is something that cannot be done without embracing the concept of photographic alteration. 

Right now, as we speak, half or more of CTs believe in Zapruder film alteration, including some awfully big names. And every single one of them should realize that once you recognize Zapruder film alteration, you have to open your mind to other photographic and film alterations. If they had the mindset to alter ANY of the images, then they had the mindset to alter ALL of the images. 

And the Altgens photo was definitely altered. Dr. David Wrone said that it was "crudely" altered. Crudely- that's the word he used. 

There is no basis to assume that Doorman moved between the Altgens photo and the Wiegman film. In the Wiegman film, we can see him standing in the center of the doorway, and independent of the Wiegman film, I proved at my reenactment that in the Altgens photo, he was also standing in the center of the doorway.

What does change drastically between the two is the position and location of Roy Lewis. In the Wiegman film, we an see him at 0 seconds and 4 seconds, and he hasn't budged.

    

Not much difference, right? And that's over 4 seconds. One thousand one, one thousand two, one thousand three, one thousand four. But in the Altgens photo he seems to be turned the other way.

 So, what gives? What gives is that Roy Lewis was out of view to Altgens; he was hidden against that west wall. And they pieced that other image of him in there. And here is where they got it from:

And here are both images of his face up close:

It's the same image, and it was taken well after the assassination when Roy Lewis was going home.

That's when Roy Lewis was looking east, not during the assassination. The picture above was taken by Phil Willis. 

So what we are seeing in the Altgens photo of Roy Lewis is a forgery. And that is why he appears to be in a different location and turned a different way from how we see him in the Wiegman film. It's not because he moved during the shooting. Look again at the curtain of visibility to Altgens, which is not in doubt.

So, if Roy Lewis was in his Wiegman position in Altgens, he was definitely out of view to Altgens. And there is every good reason to think he was in the same position. What we see of him in the Altgens photo is fake, and it is one of the anomalies listed on the Anomalies page of the OIC website. 

So again: no need to assume any major shift in Roy Lewis between Altgens to Wiegman. The difference we see is due to their having altered the photo, and of course, it was only one of many alterations they made to the Altgens photo. They were busy little beavers.